@SlyPokerDog I asked it to be changed "Conway said Trump will not pursue conviction" You even quoted it smart ass
I never did think he would actually do anything about Hillary. By all logic he shouldn't, she is done now, no sense in expending resources feeding her. But in anycase, the ball is in Jeff Sessions court now, him and Comey. I hope Trump gets that Sailor out of jail though, the one jailed for some pictures of his sub. Let Hillary rot with her thought. Perhaps the AG can do something to dissolve her cash shield cooperation.
I said it before and I will say it again.. This is simply an olive branch to the left, basically trying to effectively "reset" relations with them. Of course you wont win them all over but its (unfortunately) a good gesture. Personally, I'd lock that bitch up for a long time and put two middle fingers up to the Bernie and Hillary folk. ;-) ----- but that's why I'm not the dictator of the USA, errrrr um President.
If he went after her, it would look vindictive and not be particularly good for future criminal politicians who would otherwise consider running. On the other hand, those already elected and who abuse the office to inflict harm on their enemies (see Billy Dale) should spend serious time in prison. No country club. My take is he was informed there's an ongoing investigation and he has to do nothing but let it proceed.
Yes, on both sides. However, I don't think the vast majority of Trump supporters will take such a blase approach like Mags and Blue. They sure seemed to LITERALLY want Trump to assign a special prosecutor. In fact, I'd go so far as to say the majority of Trump supporters want him to LITERALLY do everything he promised and will be disappointed, at least, that he doesn't follow through. Which we all know he won't. Because he doesn't ultimately care about any of it sans the trade deals, IMO.
I do want him to jail her. But as Denney said he probably got information about an ongoing investigation and decided not to do that, OR he's just trying to keep the peace with people like @Rastapopoulos who are literally having a meltdown.
Maybe @Rastapopoulos should have a meltdown. I'm going to take a wait and see approach at this point. I can't change the past. What's done is done. But I fear mightily for the future. If Trump basically starts WW3 can we blame you? Or are you just going to say Clinton would have been worse?
I saw a couple of people make the same joke - something about "on top of everything else, this Trump win proves that we never invent time machines!" My response: 1. The other joke is that he's Biff in BTTF II, so maybe the wrong guy gets hold of the time machine. 2. He's not president yet...
Because other people don't obsess about petty grievances for going on for decades (e.g., the Spy Magazine "stubby fingers" thing), maybe? Because other people have some inkling of the rules (and actually knew that you have to provide your own White House staff).... ...oh what's the point.
So you believe those are reasons why he (as President of the USA) would sacrifice everything and start WW3? You sir, are being ridiculous.
And of course, your opposition to Clinton is not based on misogyny, oh no. It's funny (but not funny ha ha) how much the Trumpsters like to use the word "bitch" to describe Clinton, when if you offer a gender-neutral definition of the word then clearly Trump is the whiniest pathetic little bitch ever to campaign for president.
