Apparently most people who've met him (and who aren't (a) being paid by him or (b) bound by a non-disclosure agreement as part of a settlement) have a "vendetta" against him. Why would the guy who got rich off The Art of the Deal have a "vendetta" against him? Does thinking he's a jerk instantly discredit a source in your opinion?
Remember all those Republicans who used to be this fanatical about Bush? No, neither do they. Here's their moment of "winning":
I never liked Bush but even I miss him already. Not for any reason except for the new OT forum at S2 where the theme song is this....
When you live in a bubble, you believe those things. There are too many people who've met him and know him that say nice things about him. Things like, "what you see in the media is not what I know of him in person." Why don't you believe those accounts?
Don King says he's not racist. The NYTimes says he is. I've come to realize they can never be trusted to present a fair account of anything. And then I read things like this: http://www.westernjournalism.com/florida-lawsuit-reveals-what-trump-thinks-about-discrimination/ So maybe I'm wrong. I really hope so.
And this. http://www.westernjournalism.com/black-female-executive-speaks-out-about-working-for-trump-family/
Until we see him do something racist or not racist. If he does things that really help minorities, like he's promised, then what?
well, i assume your claims of racism were based on something. its not like you would just say that for no reason. do you think it is possible for someone who is a racist to suddenly become not a racist?
well duh, kanye is a racist too! http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...biracial-women-only-to-fashion-show-audition/
no idea! i did find this though http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/07/breitbart-sherrod-near-libel-settlement-209824
