Called it years ago when water marks werent from the era. Not surprising libs continually putting up candidates who preform illegal actions regularly.
Here's an example, ABC "reports" the same story. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/sheriff-joe-arpaio-dives-obama-birth-certificate-44218065 Oops, no they didn't. They completely ignored the story as if it never happened, going so far to infer the sheriff finally agreed the BC was genuine. Fake news.
Obama and Hillary are the greatest criminal masterminds in history, don't ya know? Seems like they could have stolen the election for her if they really wanted to. Hmmm, another conspiracy to unravel!
I moved to Hawaii a couple of weeks after Obama was born. He lived a few miles from the airport where I landed. A week later, his mother moved him to Seattle to attend the U. of Washington. I can attest to all this because I personally met him in his diapers, and can identify him through his voice.
My family had a party line every place we lived in the 50s and 60s up to 1965. Tokyo, Akron, Cincinnati, Des Moines, Hawaii you name it. But 1999? You must have been out in the sticks. Hawaii record-keeping was the same as now, only better, because it was on paper, not computer. Phones on phone poles? Never saw it, even on the other side of the island. Now, what we lacked in the early 60s was live network TV. Without satellites yet, national programs were on a 2-week delay, the tapes flown in. The local news show reported the world news. Around 1964, the first live programs (CBS, NBC, ABC evening news) were telecast through Telstar and Echo.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...proves-obama-birth-certificate-fake/95500958/ http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/sheriff-joe-arpaio-dives-obama-birth-certificate-44218065 USAToday and ABCNews I guess is what some leftish would call "real news". Although, when they both leave out the professional opinions of the forensics teams off their article it shows bias to not report the full story. Other publications picking up the story do talk about the independent forensics teams. Weird... I didn't put any credence into these claims until the forensics people concluded it was fake. Guess we'll see where it goes, if it does.
Also we need to get to the bottom of why he did 9/11. And why, as a 2 year old, he shot JFK. Luckily Sheriff Joe has more time on his hands now after not being reelected, so he should be able to knock those investigations out a little faster. barfo
Nice try, but irrefutable evidence says that George W. Bush is unlikely to ever yield that position......though the next 4 years has an extremely excellent chance of proving me wrong......but thanks for playing!
All corporate media news sources, left or right, are establishment propaganda outlets. Their forensics experts are either hired by them directly or already agree with their viewpoint, therefore their opinion should be held as suspect as the news outlet is.
What about the moon landing? Who killed JFK? What really happened at Roswell? What happened at Area 51? Is the world really flat? Chemtrails! I can't wait for Sheriff Joe's next episode! So entertaining.
