That post is full of hypocrisy. You can be angry without being a dick to everyone. The poster has not figured that life skill out yet I suppose.
People were angry with the status quo. The two guys who ran against the status quo did the best: Trump and Sanders. Only one of them was able to win against the party fix against them. The people are getting what they want for a change. Except those who want to be part of government or want money from it.
Please provide list of sources that are not 'partisan fake news'. But we should care about applause, attendance at said event? Isn't that 'feelings' too? How would a source that is not partisan fake news have reported on the event? Or maybe you are arguing that the event itself doesn't matter at all, and should not have even been mentioned in the press? barfo
It's a reality check, barfo. If you care about reality, that is. Haven't seen that you are. Carry on.
so shallow...you really are out of touch with folks.....insulting people who disagree with you.....as if they are all on welfare or want to be......get back to me when you refuse an income tax return or give up your social security benefits......double standard Denny
LOL Corporations want money from the government, too. As do all sorts of organizations that have no business getting money from it.
Speaking of which... https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...reezes-federal-hiring/?utm_term=.2a27fe99c13e Trump’s federal hiring freeze draws immediate fire from union
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...d-lower-average-approval-rating-nixon-or-bush 47.9%: Obama Had Lower Average Approval Rating Than Nixon or Bush (CNSNews.com) - President Barack Obama had an average approval rating of 47.9 percent during his time in office, according to the Gallup poll. That puts him behind Richard Nixon, who resigned, and George W. Bush, who saw his approval rating drop as low as 25 percent near the end of his term. It puts him ahead of only Gerald Ford (47.2 percent), Jimmy Carter (45.5 percent) and Harry Truman (45.4 percent). Gallup, in an analysis released Friday, published the average approval rating for all twelve presidents who have served since World War II.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...7a4a412e93a_story.html?utm_term=.913c958f743a A reporter tweets his way into trouble with a claim about Trump that lacked evidence Kurt Eichenwald is an experienced investigative journalist, with a best-selling book to his credit and years of work at the New York Times, Vanity Fair and now Newsweek. So what was Eichenwald thinking Tuesday when he tweeted this: “I believe Trump was institutionalized in a mental hospital for a nervous breakdown in 1990, which is why he won’t release medical records.” There’s no evidence that Trump was ever hospitalized for such a condition, and Eichenwald cited none.
So is this legit news with a credible poll? Or fake news and one of those polls that had Hillary winning?
Gallup is gallup. I don't think their numbers are anything but their numbers. They've been polling for generations. If you're CNN, you don't report this or call it fake news.
Wow....the first black president who was accused of being a Muslim and not a citizen for years entering office has lower approval ratings than the white guys after WWII......I'm shocked!
There was far more details to his talk than just that. But of course, continue to do what you do. Yes, I watched the entire conference.
I only pointed out, he is not a "Natural Born Citizen" according to the only definition of the term contemporary with the time the requirement was penned.
