Suppose somebody starts a political movement with the central idea that your family is non-human (yes, I know, you're a dog, but let's pretend you're really a human). Do you think just because they say "it's a political view" that you shouldn't fucking deck them? Suppose you knew that if enough people had kicked the shit out of Hitler when he first raised his head up that it would've stopped him. Should they still not have?
I agree. And I'm torn about this (I'm sure that means a lot to him). But what I'm torn about is not really his feelings. All I'm torn about is whether or not punching him give him support or undermines it. Of course fellow hard righters are going to say "see the animals we're up against". But on the other hand, if he has any appeal it's because he's looked on as a strongman type. But if he keeps getting punched in the face and running off and then going online and saying he isn't safe then I doubt he's going to get the "strongman" following. But if he keeps on getting support, then that emboldens his racist ilk and makes life for millions of immigrants and non-whites in this country (even more) miserable. If we hadn't just elected Trump I would feel more sorry for him, but these are dark times. If you don't like Hitler as an analogy, how about Moseley? The Battle of Cable Street is legendary in England: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/sep/30/thefarright.past
75 years ago thousands of Americans were in Europe punching Nazis on a daily basis. Think of it like a honor thy elders day.
punching a nazi is fine by me. my problem is when you call someone a nazi just to give yourself a reason to punch them, because you're a sore loser.
Happening already all across the USA. The left labels people they disagree with, with extreme terms as (racist/xenophobe/bigot, etc.) and then uses that as an excuse to inflict violence on regular conservatives/republicans, and/or property.
