Deutsche Bank was already fined over $600mil by the state of NY and a some more by the UK, but the DOJ was now going after them for likely Billions for being a money laundering mechanism for the Russian oligarchy, having been proved to have laundered at least 10Billion out of Russia. At the same time, Trump owes the Deutsche Bank over $300 million and so does his family. Anyways, it's complicated, but here is a news story to start on. https://www.theguardian.com/busines...-deutsche-bank-investigation-money-laundering
Geez! I fail to see how you can make a issue out of owing money to a Bank via a loan or financing, just because that bank has legal issues involving other transactions! I mean, Deutsche Bank was one of my biggest customers, and I don't think I have a problem to worry over. How the hell can a Democrat come up with one for Trump to worry over?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...et-russian-ambassador-says-kremlin-spokesman/ http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-with-russian-ambassador-putin-aide-says.html https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...nton-campaign-met-russian-officials/21884725/ Hillary was promised by Russia that they'd get her elected as payment for her illegally gifting them with 20% of all uranium mining rights in the US.
1. That's not accurate. http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/ 2. Even if it was you're actually trying to make the argument that since Hillary is crooked it's okay if Trump is crooked. Again, why not take a moment to ponder what a giant fail your logic is.
Uh... no I don't think you got it SLY. I think Maris said Look at Hillary, there is nothing to see at Trump's place. Talk about fail, take another look at how you did.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0 http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...ing-politifact-clinton-russian-uranium-story/ http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/wikileaks-podesta-emails-reveal-power-behind-clinton-campaign
