You can hardly tell them from Democrats. Listening to a couple talking on TV just this morning about not supporting repeal of Obama Care. They say one of the good things about Obama Care is requiring the coverage of preexisting conditions! HA! Now that's a moron! He would not vote for Obama Care and he won't vote to repeal it. It's way too much to expect the pea brain to understand you can't require a business to provide an unprofitable service. Listening to some of these Republicans and Democrats speak about this issue is disheartening, maybe even disgusting. They haven't got a clue as to the difference between a business enterprise and a social welfare program. Worst yet, they assume they have the POWER to make one into the other! Wake up fools, insurance companies can't not be social welfare agents on command. They will cease to be a in the healthcare coverage business. At least that is profit neutral. Example. Moda does not sell insurance in my county now.
I’ve been trying to figure out what country you are from. My guess is Switzerland with a long stop over in Amsterdam. Am I close?
No. Have been there though. But my days began in Oregon, a cabin maybe 300 yards from this Waterfall.
There is no difference between an establishment Democrat and an establishment Republican. It's two sides of the same shitty coin. If Romney won we would now have Obamacare's identical twin, Romneycare. If you bet on both sides, you always win!
Maybe if we stopped pretending that healthcare is a normal good, then maybe we'd start to get somewhere on how to fix our broken-assed system that consumes 20% of our GDP, but yields some of the worst results in the industrialized world.
Let's get rid of health insurance all tougher and instead provide health care at a far reduced percent of our GDP.
Go ahead than they can take care of a few illegals why they are here, at least Doctors and Nurses have a needed skill.
Rather than importing Mexican doctors, deport all the sick to Mexico instead. Build the fence, but make it like the set of American Ninja or whatever that obstacle course show is. When you get healthy enough to make it over the wall/moat, swinging ropes, etc, then you can come back. barfo
You know it hasn't been all that long since it worked as you suggest. "Prior to World War II, most Americans paid for their own medical care, either directly to the provider, or beginning in the 1930s, through the Blue Cross nonprofit health insurance entities which were created to offer guaranteed service for a fixed fee. Back then, health insurance really was insurance - providing coverage only for major items like hospitalizations that people could not afford to pay for themselves. All other expenses were paid out-of-pocket directly to the provider." When large employers began covering medical expenses of employees it was not really insurance as most were self insuring or covering the risk. "During World War II, the federal government was wary of post-war inflation. The administration saw the terrible devastation hyperinflation wreaked on post-World War I Germany and they were determined to hold it at bay through wage and price controls which they instituted during the war. In reaction to the wage controls, many labor groups planned to go on strike en masse. In order to avert the strike, in a concession to the labor groups, the War Labor Board exempted employer-paid health benefits from wage controls and income tax. This historical accident created a tax advantage that drove enormous demand for employer-provided health insurance plans over the previously more common individual health insurance. Employers received a 100% tax deduction while the benefits employees received were exempt from federal, state, and city taxation." It is a relatively new thing that Healthcare insurance companies offer broad coverage for sale to people that qualify. It was a good deal for most that bought it and profitable for those companies that sold it. I see no reason to get rid of it, buy it if it helps, or don't. Many people would be better off saving the premium money in a tax deductible health saving account in preparation for the day you need it. But it makes no sense for the Government to stick a hand in this business, it will not help the people that are helped when they purchase the insurance. Now if you want to reduce the cost of healthcare, then that is another game entirely. I see very little discussion in that area, and none in ObamaCare which is intended to cover people not covered primarily at the expense of people that actually purchase healthcare coverage. The new insurance covers a plethora of condition never covered before, all of which combine to make the cost of insurance a poor deal instead of help, and at the same time, make the business of providing coverage unprofitable. So now we have no help, at too high a price, that the government forces the individual to purchase. But the government can't force the Insurance company to continue offering the unprofitable product. None of this illogical intervention by the government has reduced the cost of healthcare, to the contrary, it increases it greatly by the complexity imposed on the providers. https://www.zanebenefits.com/blog/p...r-provided-health-insurance-post-world-war-ii
I agree that Obamacare doesn't do enough to reduce costs, not even close. But it did fill in the gaps and make it near impossible to completely revert. As far as paying for oneself, its impossible if something major goes wrong. My niece passed away at one month old. The bill was north of a million dollars for all the procedures firing that month. Luckly, my brother had amazing insurance which covered near everything.
