Merged: The Draft Thread For Stuff About The Draft Including Thoughts About The Draft

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by TBpup, Apr 25, 2017.

  1. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,600
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    I wonder what Philadelphia will do at #3.

    The 3 guys rumored to be worth that pick are Fox, Tatum, and Jackson. They don't need a SF, and they need shooting, so Fox isn't the idea PG.

    Do they
    1.) Draft Fox, or draft Tatum/Jackson and play Simmons at PG
    2.) Reach for Smith or Monk
    3.) Trade down into the mid lottery
    Or
    4.) Trade up to #1

    I think all these are possible. Right now I think they'll trade down to 6 (ORL) and take Smith or Monk. Orlando would probably take Tatum 3rd.
     
  2. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,600
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    What would it take to trade up to #5 (SAC)? Harkless, 15, 26, and a future 1st?

    Because I want to do that, then trade 5 and 20 up to 3 to take Tatum or Jackson.
     
  3. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,600
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Or Option 5.) Trade it for Jimmy Butler
     
  4. SheedSoNasty

    SheedSoNasty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    4,802
    Likes Received:
    5,472
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Draft express has Diallo going #35 in the second round.

    nbadraft.net has him going 20 to us now. Seems like a strange jump all of a sudden.
     
  5. Minstrel

    Minstrel Top Of The Pops Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    26,226
    Likes Received:
    14,407
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    User Interface Designer
    Location:
    Hello darkness, my old friend
    ripcityboy likes this.
  6. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    Well they did get all the way to 3rd but had to swap with 76ers which is bit unfortunate. Still, they could get Tatum at no. 5 with a bit of luck.
     
  7. Trackjack

    Trackjack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2015
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think Olshey likes Collins. I believe Collins fits Stotts system too. I believe he also fits the system he be upgrade backing up Nurk plus he properly can play some 4. He has nice stroke and plus his shot is soft from distant. Some of the NCAA playoffs this year his shot would just lay on the back rim and then it would roll in that a real soft shot. His foot work on low post is pretty good at young age. He also good rim protector but really his negative is foul trouble. But I am looking playing about 18 minutes a game. Plus he is insurance if Nurk goes down. To me if we can trade up it no brainier to me but I am not the GM.
     
    Wizard Mentor and Dougnsalem like this.
  8. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    22,669
    Likes Received:
    15,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah the 9'3" standing reach doesn't hurt.
     
  9. Trackjack

    Trackjack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2015
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your right about that that reach had him block shots with out really jumping and just keep balls alive on the offense boards.
     
  10. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    After landing #5, Sacramento could make #10 available. Depends on who they get with #5 but I see potential scenarios:

    a) they draft Jayson Tatum so still have need for a playmaker and wait for no. 10 where they get whichever of Dennis Smith, Frank Ntilikina and De'Aaron Fox is available. If they get Tatum at no. 5, they keep the pick and get a point guard IMO

    b) they draft a point guard (Fox?) and know that they could either get Markkanen or Isaac at no. 10 but prefer to actually have two players instead of one so are willing to trade that for our no. 15 and no. 20 so they can get Anonuby/Jackson/Ferguson to play no. 3 and Collins/Hartenstein/Leaf for 4.
     
  11. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,600
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Honestly, I'd offer Harkless, 20, 26, and the future MIN/LAL 2nd for 10 & 34.

    Keep 10 & 15, take Collins and Jackson.
     
    UKRAINEFAN likes this.
  12. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    Maybe they would take that. Fat chance though, Harkless himself is maybe worth no. 25 in this draft. You need to include 15 for them to consider, that's where good players will be available.

    Maybe 20, 26 and 2018 1st.
     
  13. JDC

    JDC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,425
    Likes Received:
    3,246
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Watched some FIBA U18 tape to get a look at Diallo in a competitive setting and color me impressed. From a physical tools standpoint, he blows Terrance Ferguson out of the water. Works his ass off defensively too.

    Still super raw offensively though. Mainly an energy guy but I love his aggressiveness (draws a ton of fouls), agility and frame which he should be able to add a lot of weight to.

    I would be very ok with him at #15 and to be honest, if Neil thinks Zach can't play the 4, I'd be tempted to roll the dice with Diallo over him even if he fell to us. Wings with his combination of tools don't come around very often.
     
    Last edited: May 17, 2017
  14. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,600
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    There's not a big difference between 15 & 20
     
  15. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    Well there's though. Five spots.
     
  16. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,051
    Likes Received:
    30,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    But if we'd tanked those last couple of weeks, it would have been between 13 and 20. What a huge lost opportunity.
     
  17. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    If Kings offer both their picks for McCollum, do you consider it? I don't think they will, pretty sure there is literally zero chance of that happening but in theory, if they do?

    What if Magic offer #6 and #24 plus a player?

    Or if Timberwolves offer us #7 plus future 1st round pick?

    Or if we can get Porzingis plus #8 from the Knicks for CJ and #15?

    I am just wondering here. It would be a full blown rebuild from there but maybe it would make a little sense if we think we cannot build around CJ.

    Or straight up #3 and one of Phila's second rounders for CJ?
     
  18. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    The tough part about trading CJ is that he is a proven scoring commodity. The reasons why you look at it is because he is now a $23M player who doesn't pass and doesn't really play defense when you already have a similar size player doing the same thing making $25M. It's a little like if you had a Kyle Korver....you don't need an Allan Crabbe. They both are basically the same player doing one thing well.

    If there are opportunities to create more balance with more of a two-way player, I have to look at that. It's not like Dame/CJ were producing anything at contender level.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  19. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Biggest problem with CJ trade scenarios is the fact that virtually none of them can be consummated until July due to the poison pill provision currently in place due to his extension. So for any of the above, it would all have to be dependent upon who is actually drafted in that spot.
     
    Darkwebs and TBpup like this.
  20. Sarni

    Sarni Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2016
    Messages:
    3,324
    Likes Received:
    2,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Kraków, Poland
    That's also my thinking. You may say that adding another piece to this team could make us a contender, but could it? I still stand by what I said, there is no quick fix to make this team contend in the short term. People who want to trade all our picks for the level of Thad Young or Trevor Booker are just deluding themselves into thinking that it would miraculously solve all our problems when reality is that it would add 3-5 wins and still make us too weak to compete against the big guns.
     
    TBpup likes this.

Share This Page