No matter how many times you post that it just isn't true. http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Maybe you're a SheepleDog? Snopes? 100% Discredited as anything other than a DNC propaganda site. Think of PT Barnum. But it's clear you didn't read your link, as nobody does. Snopes as usual doesn't provide any evidence to the contrary, nor does it ever ask the fact provider to present their evidence. Just babbles on about things not really related (to bore you so you'll skip to the end (their "conclusion") then presents their arbitrary conclusion without supporting it in any way. Every word in my post has been verified ad nauseum by most true investigative media and is heavily backed up by email and documents readily available on wikileaks. The Clintons, who are always quick to scream FAKE NEWS, have never tried to deny it, as they know the records are there in black and white.
I know you can read. Here's your chance to be accurately informed like me. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/ https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of MARIS61, a fictional message board character created for my amusement, and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of any real person alive or deceased.
Exclusive: Trump campaign had at least 18 undisclosed contacts with Russians: sources http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-contacts-idUSKCN18E106
Do you read your own articles? "The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed"
