Unfortunately, you are correct. I lump CNN in the same camp as Breitbart and the Huffington Post. Neither of them should be taken seriously as a credible news source.
It's sad. I literally watch the morning news have local chefs on as a form of advertisement and then hear the anchors talk shit about Trump and then go on to TMZ level celebrity babble. It's really pathetic but that's where we are.
Or you need to read more carefully. Nobody said the invitation was rescinded. What the article said was that he wasn't going, despite the invitation. If you can find a schedule for him going, then you can call bullshit on the article. Otherwise, you are barking up the wrong tree. barfo
I only get Fox and NBC local affiliates because I'm blocked being below the antennas on the mountain in the southern valley. The Fox 5 affiliate seems to be facebooking their on location reports now where they are so pixelated it looks like 90's internet porn quality. The NBC affiliate has a news copter and HD remote feeds. I can tell the fox shit is just their shitty feed because their logo is still perfectly clear. Their remotes are like watching a video in a text message app. OH, and their fucking weather chick uses emojis instead of sun icons. It's amateur hour.
Oh, is he supposed to be laughing? I thought that was the look on his face when the russian hookers peed on it. barfo
Shit happens, if you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen and so on. Riverman likes to......I'm talking about feeling.....type something tangential....insert snide orange Trump comment....takes a brisk walk in the evening..think of another Trump insult...mention something Asian....insert veiled personal insult....go off in another direction......likes to use his right ring finger to go..........blah d blah d da.....I'm gonna ignore this..... yuk, can't keep that up.
He gets snotty, he admits it. Last time was after a graveyard shift. I'm kind and respectful when we first meet to a fault. I'm still an asshole in general.
And I already quoted you the part of the article that said his plans were still on for visiting the UK, and that they weren't commenting on private conversations....which means that the Guardian had SPECULATION, and not FACT. Which is the usual norm for media outlets using clickbait articles nowadays. If you actually bothered to read the entire article, you would have seen that. I don't have a problem with River; I'm sure he's a great guy, and at times I'll even like a post of his. But I also don't agree with many of his positions that use emotion in the place of rational logic and reason. If this argument is what's going to put me on his ignore list, then that's his problem, not mine.
I could put a bunch of people on ignore and suddenly make this a liberal forum, but that wouldn't be any fun. I enjoy the argument
