Blazers scheduled workouts list

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Scalma, Jun 1, 2017.

  1. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bryant talked a lot about defensive versatility and communication. Swanigan didn't mention defense once, but was only really asked about the workout itself for about 30 seconds.
     
  2. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Of course, but Nam's standing reach is 9'0 which is undersized for a C.
     
  3. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,845
    Likes Received:
    26,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    Aside: 88 was Batum's number and 44 was Montero's, wasn't it? Are they just recycling ex-players' practice jerseys?
     
  4. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    41,845
    Likes Received:
    26,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    Is Thomas Bryant any relation to Mark Bryant? I think I see a resemblance, in hair if in nothing else.
     
  5. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nurk's standing reach is only 1.5" higher than Bam's, and Bam's vert is about 12-15" higher. Do we care about vert reach, or only standing reach?
     
    dviss1 likes this.
  6. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,211
    Likes Received:
    15,674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree with this. Standing reach for centers and wing span for wings is more important than height. Which is why I never had a problem with Cliff Alexander as a potential backup at center. 6'7" 1/4 height but a 9'1.5" standing reach. (Same as Nurk)

    Notable bigs in this draft:

    Zach Collins 9'3 standing reach
    Patton 9'3.5" standing reach
     
  7. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Standing reach is much more important in low post defense, because the defenders usually on the ground when the low post player gets to their shot. If their in the air, the low post player pump fakes and goes up and under, or draws the foul.
     
  8. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,325
    Likes Received:
    43,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    More important, sure, but that doesn't mean vert is completely irrelevant. But if you're dead set on the notion that above-average strength and athleticism (which he has) can't compensate for being 2' below average in standing reach, nothing I can say will sway you.
     
  9. 42N8Bounce

    42N8Bounce Red Hot And Rebuilding

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,802
    Likes Received:
    8,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    West Linn, OR
    Caleb Swanigan:
    Yes, he's undersized and not strong defensively, but wow, this guy should not be a second round pick. I'm hoping the Blazers pick him up somehow.
     
    riverman likes this.
  10. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    I'm saying he'll be an average defender at C because of the combination of a below average standing reach and above average strength and athleticism. Thing is, that's his only real strength coming into the draft, so if its not a strength of his in the NBA, he won't be a good player.
     
  11. Destroyer of Worlds

    Destroyer of Worlds Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2017
    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    200
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Seems to work pretty well for Tristan Thompson
     
  12. ripcityboy

    ripcityboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    12,934
    Likes Received:
    10,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    pdx, or, usa.
    Suprised he's not ranked higher. He was the hottest thing coming out of the Big 10 last year.
     
  13. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Swanigan is a horrible defender who's undersized and unathletic, who's range doesn't extend to NBA 3
     
  14. tester551

    tester551 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    3,849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He's not undersized at all. He's one of the best 3pnt shooting bigs in the draft, so I'm very confident he'll be able to extend it to NBA range.
    He struggles defensively, but when you look at the advanced metrics - he still grades out better than 1/2 the other bigs in the draft.
    Worst case, he's Sullinger - more likely he's early Memphis version of Zbo
     
    Blazer4ever and 42N8Bounce like this.
  15. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why wouldn't he be able to shoot threes in the NBA? He looks super comfortable shooting the ball. His size is fine at power forward. Ton of PFs with his measurements. I like his patience in the post. I like his rebounding. I like his passing. Good free throw shooter. He's got a little Kevin love in his game. He's probably going to be one of those guys overlooked until a playoff team at the end of the first or second sees his value and ends up making a lot of front offices look dumb.
     
    42N8Bounce likes this.
  16. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IMG_0843.JPG

    Looks like I wasn't the only one that saw some Looove in him.
     
    dviss1 and 42N8Bounce like this.
  17. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    He has an 8'11/9'0 standing reach. I guess that's average size, but he has a 29" vertical. He'll be a horrendous NBA defender, because PFs are so much agile and athletic, and Swanigan is extremely slow laterally. He won't be a help side influence either. His rebounding won't translate as well as other great rebounders due to his lack of elite size and his lack of athleticism.

    So I've heard Kennards floor is J.J. Redick, and now Swanigan is more likely to be an all-star instead of a role player.

    This board is overrating the hell out of the back end of the 1st round. A lot of posters are making the mistake of thinking everything a player does in college he'll be able to do in the NBA.
     
    Schilly likes this.
  18. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Sorry, but this is dumb. You can't look base a prospect based off a similarity in college stats between them and a pro before them.

    With that logic, Frank Mason is a future all star and the next Isaiah Thomas.
     
  19. Sheldon Shape

    Sheldon Shape Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,596
    Likes Received:
    6,474
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rebounding almost always translates. They said the same thing about Randolph, Dejuan Blair, Millsap, Draymond Green, etc. He's a bad defender, but so was Zach. If you can get a Zach Randolph late in the first round, it's probably worth it. Every single draft there are sf/pf/tweeners who go undervalued. Let's find one.
     
    dviss1 and 42N8Bounce like this.
  20. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,577
    Likes Received:
    38,667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    He's nothing like Kevin Love. Love is much craftier, skilled, with much better footwork than Swanagin. Love could also put the ball on the floor and get to spots, which is something Swanigan couldn't even do in college. Swanigan can't shoot off the dribble either. Swanigan played bully ball in college. It won't work in the NBA.

    Swanigan will be a horrible NBA player. Count on it.
     

Share This Page