Notice Kevin Love as a Trail Blazer Just Makes Sense

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

BigGameDamian

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
34,775
Likes
14,215
Points
113
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bl...land-trail-blazers-cleveland-cavaliers-salary

usa_today_10069071.0.jpg



Why Cleveland’s forward would fit in Portland now when he never would have before.

Star power forwards have been a hot topic around Trail Blazers nation this summer. Another one comes up in this edition of the Blazer’s Edge Mailbag.

Yo Dave,

Chris Haynes recently stated on the Dan Patrick show that if Cleveland lost the finals Kevin Love would be traded. This got me wondering if they would take a first round pick and Allen Crabbe for him? Would they take it? Would Love be a good fit in Portland? I love the idea of Dame, CJ, Love and Nurkic!

John Pumpkin

When the Blazers had cap flexibility and potential free agents on the horizon, acquiring Kevin Love would have made little sense. He was too expensive, his defense had the potential to create a toxic sludge stew when combined with Damian Lillard and CJ McCollum...there were better options.

In 2017 with the team flat-lined, broke, and many times rejected, Love might just be the answer.

The problems with adding Love to Portland’s mix tape haven’t gone away, but the questions have changed. We need no longer ask whether Love is enough to push the Trail Blazers over the top. We need no longer ask whether he’ll inhibit the growth curve of Portland’s young players. We don’t have to balance his upside with his huge cap footprint anymore. All we need to know now is whether he’ll be more serviceable than Allen Crabbe at the same relative amount of money. It’s that simple.

With McCollum and Lillard hogging up the backcourt, Evan Turner waiting in the wings, and a potential draft pick filling any empty corners, the answer to that question is going to be a resounding, “Yes!” from every angle.

The financials of a Love-for-Crabbe exchange make sense...mostly. Love’s contract runs for the next two years guaranteed: $22.6 million in 2017-18 and $24.2 million in 2018-19. He has a player option in 2019-20 for $25.6 million. Crabbe’s numbers over that same period are $19.3 million, $18.5 million, and $18.5 million, the final season a player option just like Love’s.

The first-year difference between the two ends up negligible. After that the gap spreads, culminating with Love earning almost $6 million more per season. The Blazers would be firmly entrenched in Luxury Tax Hell at that point, courtesy of Jusuf Nurkic’s new contract and needing to carry more than four players on the team. That $6 million gap could balloon to $20 million in real dollars.

The Blazers could solve the issue by attaching other players to the deal. Noah Vonleh would even out the finances this year. Including Ed Davis instead would actually save Portland money. Neither one is guaranteed to be with the team long-term, though. If the Cavaliers wanted Moe Harkless or Meyers Leonard in addition to Crabbe (both of which would make some sense in Cleveland) Portland could breathe easier. This would be the definition of a sweetheart deal. Throwing in a draft pick to make it happen wouldn’t be a huge burden considering the talent influx and long-term tax relief.

For those worried about talent and fit, Love had a resurgence last season. He scores 19 per game, has a serviceable three-point shot, and plays at a position of need. He’s 28 and under a binding contract. Getting all those things wrapped in one package for excess players from a muddled roster would be a godsend no matter what Love’s shortcomings may be.

Cleveland’s side may be a sticky wicket. They’re already at the pinnacle of the Eastern Conference and should remain there as long as LeBron James is functional. Golden State is their problem. Assuming the most enticing talent package is on the table, Crabbe, Harkless, and the 15th pick would help them. Would those players make the difference between winning and losing in the NBA Finals against the Warriors, though? Would they help more than Kevin Love has? That’s doubtful.

Cleveland doesn’t get a clear upgrade, doesn’t get cap savings, and any future potential they pick up will be compensated for by LeBron aging in parallel. I’m not sure what they can reasonably expect in trade for Love, but there’s got to be more upside than that for them.

So yeah, given the current state of the team I’d take Kevin Love without a second thought. He wouldn’t put the Blazers in contention but he’d give them the aura of those mid-80’s teams with Steve Johnson and Kiki Vandeweghe...not ready to be taken seriously yet but stocked with assets and able to give most teams a good run.

How about the rest of you? Yes or no on a Love-for-Crabbe (and change) deal? How high do you think Love could help the Blazers rise?

 
Haha, the Cavs are thinking about getting Paul George for Love.

I guess Allen fucking Crabbe is the next best thing?
 
I actually think Love would be fantastic with this team. He would probably also fit with the Blazers better than the current team he's on now.
 
He'd definitely be an upgrade at PF for us. He can shoot the 3, pass, rebound...
 
shes beautiful, but its her personality whats driving me crazy
shes so akward and thats so sexy, but I like her big eyes too
 
and cant defend, he would fit in this team greatly
if we didnt have Nurkic, wed be like worst defensive team in the league
Why do you think he's such a bad defender? There aren't many post up PFs in the league anyway.
 
Players get these "reps" on message boards that are repeated, but how often is that opinion backed up by really watching film of the player?
 
It doesn't make sense for Cleveland, because they become worse.
It doesn't make sense for Love, as his chance of making the finals diminishes.
It doesn't make sense for Portland, as while it is a definite talent upgrade, it makes our defense worse (why do you think they want to trade him?!?)

Other than that, it makes sense:cool2:
 
Why do you think he's such a bad defender? There aren't many post up PFs in the league anyway.
I agree hed be great fit in our ofensive system, he can shoot the ball, and he would benefit playing alongside Nurkic, just like Vonleh, so hed be double threat, but given we have Dame and CJ playing no defence, I would pretty much like bringing some PF that can defend, that can make our defence better with Nurkic, cause we have enough points in Dame, CJ and Nurk, and ofc bench have to do their part

I dont know, I dont mind Love at all, hes just not my preferable choice... and I wouldnt want him to fuck Nurkics progress here, I guess one ball wouldnt be enough for those four
 
Last edited:
I don't get the dig on Love playing poor defense. Cavs played bad team defense all year but it wasn't Loves fault. He plays prett good man on man defense and has shown he can handle his own on the perimeter against quick guards. He struggles in the PNR but you aren't going to find many stretch 4/5's that do all of that well. Compare his advance stats to Vonleh or Aminu and tell me what you see.

All of this is irrelevant because we won't ever land him given our assets but the idea that people would prefer our current options over him is insane.
 
Why do you think he's such a bad defender? There aren't many post up PFs in the league anyway.

It's not about defending post-ups. It's about the fact that, like the Warriors did to the Cavaliers, opposing teams will put Love's man in the pick-and-roll and force him to navigate those over and over and Love is pretty awful out in space.

Having three major defensive minuses, especially against the pick-and-roll, isn't really tenable.
 
Love would hurt Nurks scoring and rebounding numbers.


And that would mean Nurk isn't a max player.


Not a bad thing.
 
Loves defensive rating per 100 pos isn't nearly as bad as you would think, the main thing is offensive rating is a major + over his Drtg. Career 116/106 I will take a +10 if the price is right and Cleveland doesn't need picks so the price is probably right.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top