Is he the next Earl Boykins/Nate Robinson. I think he can be even better than those guys offensively. He's got an amazing jumpshot for a freshman, he's quick and explosive, and he's got a mean floater too. He's only a freshman and averaging 14 a game for a good team in the Ducks.What do y'all think?
He needs to develop more, then he might be a good prospect. He probably will though, with 2-3 more years under his belt
I don't know.. He is just so small, only 155 pounds.. But he's crazy quick, good handles, solid jumper.. He needs to add some muscle, and become more consistant. His defense isn't great, and he needs to be more of a PG and be a playmaker because in the NBA he will not be able to get his shot off alot.
Oh come on, guys....If Earl and Nate can make it to the NBA as scorers off the bench, so can this guy.
But Earl passes so he doesn't need his height and Nate Jumps and dunks so his height doesn't really phase him, but Porter can only shoot. I agree he is great, I love him and I love him, but I dont see him doing much if anything in the NBA. He might be able to pull up wayyy behind the line in college but thats just barely NBA range, and the guys play better D in the L
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vcfan15 @ Mar 14 2007, 10:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>But Earl passes so he doesn't need his height and Nate Jumps and dunks so his height doesn't really phase him, but Porter can only shoot. I agree he is great, I love him and I love him, but I dont see him doing much if anything in the NBA. He might be able to pull up wayyy behind the line in college but thats just barely NBA range, and the guys play better D in the L</div>What? Earl is one of the worst PG passers in the League. What does dunking have to do with having game? This post just doesn't make much sense. Porter can also hit the floater too, he isn't just a shooter.
