Science Evidence that ancient farms had very different origins than previously thought

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by SlyPokerDog, Aug 4, 2017.

  1. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,812
    Likes Received:
    122,796
    Trophy Points:
    115
    It's an idea that could transform our understanding of how humans went from small bands of hunter-gatherers to farmers and urbanites. Until recently, anthropologists believed cities and farms emerged about 9,000 years ago in the Mediterranean and Middle East. But now a team of interdisciplinary researchers has gathered evidence showing how civilization as we know it may have emerged at the equator, in tropical forests. Not only that, but people began altering their environments for food and shelter about 30,000 years earlier than we thought.

    For centuries, archaeologists believed that ancient people couldn't live in tropical jungles. The environment was simply too harsh and challenging, they thought. As a result, scientists simply didn't look for clues of ancient civilizations in the tropics. Instead, they turned their attention to the Middle East, where we have ample evidence that hunter-gatherers settled down in farming villages 9,000 years ago during a period dubbed the "Neolithic revolution." Eventually, these farmers' offspring built the ziggurats of Mesopotamia and the great pyramids of Egypt. It seemed certain that city life came from these places and spread from there around the world.

    But now that story seems increasingly uncertain. In an article published in Nature Plants, Max Planck Institute archaeologist Patrick Roberts and his colleagues explain that cities and farms are far older than we think. Using techniques ranging from genetic sampling of forest ecosystems and isotope analysis of human teeth, to soil analysis and lidar, the researchers have found ample evidence that people at the equator were actively changing the natural world to make it more human-centric.

    It all started about 45,000 years ago. At that point, people began burned down vegetation to make room for plant resources and homes. Over the next 35,000 years, the simple practice of burning back forest evolved. People mixed specialized soils for growing plants; they drained swamps for agriculture; they domesticated animals like chickens; and they farmed yam, taro, sweet potato, chili pepper, black pepper, mango, and bananas.

    École française d'Extrême-Orient archaeologist Damian Evans, a co-author on the Nature paper, said that it wasn't until a recent conference brought international researchers together that they realized they'd discovered a global pattern. Very similar evidence for ancient farming could be seen in equatorial Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia. Much later, people began building "garden cities" in these same regions, where they lived in low-density neighborhoods surrounded by cultivated land.

    Evans, Roberts, and their colleagues aren't just raising questions about where cities originated. More importantly, Roberts told Ars via email, they are challenging the idea of a "Neolithic revolution" in which the shift to city life happened in just a few hundred years. In the tropics, there was no bright line between a nomadic existence and agricultural life. When humans first arrived in South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Melanesia, they spent millennia adapting to the tropics, eventually "shaping environments to meet their own needs," he said. "So rather than huge leaps, what we see is a continuation of this local knowledge and adaptation in these regions through time."

    https://arstechnica.com/science/201...-30000-years-earlier-than-previously-thought/
     
    GriLtCheeZ and riverman like this.
  2. theprunetang

    theprunetang Shaedon "Deadly Nightshade" Sharpe is HIM

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    11,700
    Likes Received:
    21,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Primitive humans, 35,000 years ago, could do something that we can't.


    *look for the content in bold.
     
  3. MarAzul

    MarAzul LongShip

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    21,370
    Likes Received:
    7,281
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Life is good!
    Location:
    Near Bandon Oregon
    Umm, this is an interesting statement, "may have been what saved us from the fate of the Neanderthals."

    I can't make out what that means in light of recent information I have from 23andme. My kids had me take this test. It identified me as 77% British Islander. But also 200 parts out of a possible
    390 as Neanderthal.
     
    riverman and theprunetang like this.
  4. Shaboid

    Shaboid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2014
    Messages:
    10,022
    Likes Received:
    13,152
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anthropology isnt my preferred branch of science, and I usually wouldn't even read a thread like this, but I'm glad I did just for this comment alone. That's funny right there!
     
    Dougnsalem and theprunetang like this.
  5. Stevenson

    Stevenson Old School

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,130
    Likes Received:
    5,311
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Writer
    Location:
    PDX
    You guys might really like this book - Sapiens. Fascinating, well written, deals with all of this stuff in an understandable, enjoyable way.
     
    SlyPokerDog and riverman like this.
  6. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,037
    Likes Received:
    24,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Maybe, but if the best you can do at a task is what a chicken can, then you aren't very skilled.

    barfo
     
    theprunetang likes this.
  7. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    21,473
    Likes Received:
    27,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A small point, but the article you cited referred to chili peppers - can this be verified? Because all previous evidence was that chilies were native to what we now call the Americas. Not Africa.
     

Share This Page