You may have already stated but were you against when Clinton was investigated and there was an impeachment vote?
Trump doesn't understand democracy....our Constitution gives the legislative branch the authority to keep the president in check if necessary....and it's looking like it's pretty necessary. It's not military doctrine Marz.....if you're wrong, you can be contested in govt.....that's why we have 3 branches of govt....not that they work well together, but Trump clearly doesn't understand that he's not a dictator....he's the most unqualified American president ever to serve.....
Clinton was a fool that deserved harassment. But impeachment for the blue dress episode was really a childish move by Congrees. Yes, I was very much against it.
He has not harmed me or mine one bit. I haven't heard a howl out you either. Much bitching but no indication of pain.
Yes, we had several attacks on the nation, like the Trade center, embassies and ships. The response from the US was dismal and ineffectual. Perhaps he is just ineffectual, but I attributed it partly to his being preoccupied with defending himself from political harassment. I must say though, tales of the blue dress and abused cigars was embarrassing. Oh, btw, I voted for the dweeb.
Salon.com. Massive left tilt. http://www.salon.com/2017/08/15/wha...ions-media-and-democrats-would-rather-ignore/ What if the DNC Russian “hack” was really a leak after all? A new report raises questions media and Democrats would rather ignore A group of intelligence pros and forensic investigators tell The Nation there was no hack— the media ignores it If all this is true, these findings would constitute a massive embarrassment for not only the DNC itself but the media, which has breathlessly pushed the Russian hacking narrative for an entire year, almost without question but with little solid evidence to back it up. You could easily be forgiven for not having heard about this latest development — because, perhaps to avoid potential embarrassment, the media has completely ignored it. Instead, to this point only a few right-wing sites have seen fit to publish follow-ups. The original piece, authored by former Salon columnist Patrick Lawrence (also known as Patrick L. Smith) appeared in The Nation on Aug. 9. The findings it details are supported by a group of strongly credentialed and well-respected forensic investigators and former NSA and CIA officials. The group call themselves Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, or VIPS, and originally came together in 2003 to protest the use of faulty intelligence to justify the invasion of Iraq under President George W. Bush. ... The silence from mainstream outlets on this is interesting, if for no other reason than the information appears in a highly-regarded liberal magazine with a reputation for vigorous and thorough reporting — not some right-wing fringe conspiracy outlet carrying water for Donald Trump.
