Ok, whatever. 23rd is a weak day, nothing that will do really good. Nothing interests me. That Adam Sandler movie will probably do the best. The only reason people will see it because it's Adam Sandler. Idc much for that movie. Other than that I guess TMNT. Im not going to see that thoughPinoy, idk about you
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>? Do you have a list or something</div>Reign Over Me(Sandler/Cheadle post 9/11 film)TMNT(Obvious)Pride(Terrence Howard/Bernie Mac film)Hills Have Eyes 2(Straight to DVD sequel, oh wait)Shooter(Walberg's Bourne Identity)Last Mimsy(Dwight Shrute in a kids film)I'm not going to see either of them but that's because I don't go to the theater unless it's a movie I'm anticipating to see. None of the selections strike me to pay 7.50. If I had to choose, it would be Reign Over Me. I heard some good stuff about it and it's not your typical Sandler fare. He does good job in his dramatic roles and has a good story to it. Other than that, I rather rent Shooter, Last Mimsy, TMNT, don't give a sh*t about Pride lol. And Hills Have Eyes 2 looks like crap, better off direct to DVD because that's what the trailer presents itself to look like.
Out of all those ROK listed, I'm definitely seeing Shooter, Mark Wahlberg is dominant and is always in good movies, I'm currently reading the book and the movie looks like it's going to be very good. Reign Over Me looks solid with Sandler playing a very different role. Looks interesting. The Hills Have Eyes 2 I will see too, the first one was entertaining, this one looks better.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>The Hills Have Eyes 2 I will see too, the first one was entertaining, this one looks better.</div>First one was a solid remake with nice gore and great turn by Stanford, I don't like what I see from the 2nd. Plot seems to be military unit in the same deserted location being attacked. That's a snore and a copout used for direct to DVD sequels.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rok @ Mar 16 2007, 11:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>First one was a solid remake with nice gore and great turn by Stanford, I don't like what I see from the 2nd. Plot seems to be military unit in the same deserted location being attacked. That's a snore and a copout used for direct to DVD sequels.</div> There's only so much you can do with that storyline, I agree.
Reign Over Me looks good. I would like to see TMNT, but I might wait to see how badly they molested the franchise.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>The action will be worth watching... lol</div> I give it some points for the plot, it's like Running Man meets Battle Royale. But that's it. WWE Films is going to bomb worse than XFL.
I'm seeing Shooter TODAY. My dad got a sneak preview pass from one of his students that is a promoter for movies...Me, my dad, and my brother are going. Should be good, although it has a low tomato rating as of now...
Yeah, Shooter has a really bad tomato rating, a lot of people are saying it's ridiculous...etc...That sucks, I was looking forward to it.
I got back about an hour ago. It was decent. The things that I didnt like were that the FBI Agent (Nick memphis) did a pretty terrible job of acting. He was way too quiet and he had no self confidence or swagger. They did a bad job of casting him in my opinion. Also the plot was kind of screwy, but Mark Wahlberg did a decent job, and the action scenes were good. It also had a few comedic lines also.7/10
