Dude is all over the place. Starts a Tank thread and then says he is "OUT". Then gets on the game thread and says how much they need this win and they really should go on a run.
If you want to think for a second that Paul George wouldn't help this team you are obviously a confused soul. Your basketball concept needs evaluation at the very least. Here is what you are suggesting. Harkless might be better for this team than George. That alone should make sense. But lets add another twist. You are suggesting Turner might bring what George does. Now for the best. You are suggesting Aminu could actually carry out what Paul George does on a nightly basis. This might be why people question your responses to things on this forum.
So you're a stats guy. Got it. George most likely would have helped us, but it's not like the Pacers and Thunder, so far have been world beaters with him. What would we have given up for him?
Jake looks like he could be a good player. Just because he's so athletic, has a bounce to his step, and seems like a good shooter, though his percentages in spot minutes haven't really been good. I think the calls for Layman are just desparation to get more production from the SF position.
Layman needs to go to an absolute shit team where he can play consistent minutes. He's never going to get consistent minutes on a playoff-bubble team. And without consistent minutes he'll never get to the point where he has an NBA game. But with 2-3 years of playing 15+ minutes a game on a team with zero expectations he could work his way up to being a role player on a good team. Basically he's Luke Babbitt, but further down in the pecking order than Babbitt was.
Stats Guy??? WTF are you talking about? Are you honestly trying to say Paul George is only better on a stat sheet?
