I am so desperate for change, that I like this! Ahh, something new to watch. Finally. He can cover for McCollum's defense. If Rush does alright, this will cover the gap when Olshey trades McCollum.
I knew about minimum payroll, but what's this about a minimum number of players? It changes during the season?
Then Baldwin IV must count. number of players...date...roster change 14 plus C.J. Wilcox and Wade Baldwin...before Jan. 30 15...Jan. 30...recall Wade Baldwin IV 14...Feb. 8...trade Vonleh for Milovan Rakovic 13...unknown date...waive Rakovic 14...Feb. 19...sign Brandon Rush
Correction number of players...date...roster change 14 plus C.J. Wilcox and Wade Baldwin...before Jan. 30 15...Jan. 30...recall Wade Baldwin IV 15...Feb. 8...trade Vonleh for Milovan Rakovic 14...unknown date...waive Rakovic 15...Feb. 19...sign Brandon Rush Help me straighten this out.
Then it's number of players...date...roster change 14 ...before Feb. 8 14...Feb. 8...trade Vonleh for Milovan Rakovic 13...unknown date...waive Rakovic 14...Feb. 19...sign Brandon Rush Why did the league let us be at 13? My only theory is, we waived Rakovic the same day we signed Rush.
So, this is literally the cheapest move they could have made. He's a practice player. Nothing to get either excited about or worried about.
It appears our roster was at 13 for 11 days, which is why I started asking about the 14 minimum. My theories were 1) the minimum changes during the season? Of course not. 2) The Baldwin addition counted? New situation this year. 3) Rakovich was waived 11 days after the Vonleh trade? No, we just owned his rights, but didn't sign him. 4) My new theory: Maybe they give teams a grace period after the Trade Deadline to return to 14? 14 ...before Feb. 8 13...Feb. 8...trade Vonleh for Milovan Rakovic rights, but do not sign Rakovic 14...Feb. 19...sign Brandon Rush
Why? Waiving Myers wouldn't release the team of his contract so there is no reason to just release him.
How does a guy not playing in the rotation being waived make the roster better? We have 15 roster spots so it's no burden. Waiving him now would be foolish and not improve the team at all.
Rakovic was never under contract - and so was never waived. And by the way, Google is your friend.... http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q79 Portland only had 2 weeks to get a 14th player on the roster.
We waived Rakovic? We never signed him. He was never on our roster. We traded for his rights should he ever come to the nba.