The full indictment: Your snopes article only addresses the first post an older article, claiming it is false without offering anything to disprove it. Snopes does not address the post to the current full text of the 24 page indictment, obviously true, and also shows snopes was wrong in calling the older post false when they should have called it unproven.
Your case number, it comes back to an entirely different case. https://www.google.com/search?sourc...i264k1j0i131k1j0i131i20i264k1.121.ocfCYDjBCsk
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/u...-twofer-including-a-land-grab/article/2650208 The Politicization of the FBI March 5, 2018 | Categories: Guest Contributions | Tags: | Print This Article The Politicization of the FBI Joseph E. diGenova Former U.S. Attorney Imprimis It is a mystery that James Comey, Robert Mueller, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Bruce Ohr, Rod Rosenstein, Hillary Clinton, and others are not indicted and facing long prison sentences. US Attorney Joseph diGenova in the article excerpted below explains the criminal plot and felonies committed by the top leadership of the FBI and Department of Justice. DiGenova is talking about much more than mere politicization. He is talking about lawlessness and treason on the part of the top leadership of the US justice system. Apparently Trump lacks the balls to hold law enforcement accountable to law. Don’t expect to hear one word of the actual facts from the presstitutes or the Democratic Party. PCR In sum, the FBI and DOJ employed unverified salacious allegations contained in a political opposition research document to obtain court-sanctioned wiretaps, and then leaked the contents of the wiretaps and the identities of political opponents. This was a complex criminal plot worthy of Jason Bourne. Layered over this debacle is a special counsel investigation unfettered by rules or law. Not surprisingly, James Comey triggered the special counsel’s appointment—and he did so by design. According to Comey’s testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, having been fired on May 9, 2017, he leaked official documents to his friend, Columbia Law School professor Daniel Richman, with the specific intent that Richman would leak them to the press. Reportage on that leak is what led Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to appoint Robert Mueller—a former FBI director and Comey’s good friend—as special counsel to investigate allegations of Trump-Russia collusion. Mueller’s reputation has been damaged by a series of decisions that violate the ethical rules of appearances. For instance, he hired Democratic partisans as lawyers for the probe: Andrew Weissmann, who donated to Clinton and praised Acting Attorney General Sally Yates for disobeying Trump’s lawful Presidential Order regarding a travel ban for residents of certain nations that harbor terrorists; Jeannie Rhee, who donated to Clinton and represented Ben Rhodes in the email probe and the Clinton Foundation investigation; and Aaron Zebley, who represented Clinton IT staffer Justin Cooper in the email server probe. Mueller also staged a pre-dawn raid with weapons drawn on the home of Paul Manafort, rousing Manafort and his wife from their bed—a tactic customarily reserved for terrorists and drug dealers. Manafort has subsequently been indicted for financial crimes that antedate his campaign work for Trump and that have nothing to do with Russia collusion. From the outset of this scandal, I have considered Comey a dirty cop. . . . A great disservice has been done to the dedicated men and women of the FBI by Comey and his seventh floor henchmen. A grand jury probe is long overdue. Read the entire article: https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/the-politicization-of-the-fbi/?appeal_code=MK218EM5&utm_campaign=imprimis&utm_source=housefile&utm_medium=email&utm_content=feb_2018_politicization_fbi&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_1mHeawneB300eC94NVKUiNzFRQYBbJSJHqEh7OZQWIDPB5o4v92GSXLVO1kdPE-VQL9vEthjoREujRp0sue4WwLp_Tw&_hsmi=61107704
You searched an incomplete number. Include Document 64 on the end. Leads right to it. Came across your persona on another board talking about it. edpc [/paste:font] Hero Member Posts: 6,265 Professional Misanthrope Re: Would Someone Look At This ... « Reply #4 on: March 03, 2018, 07:14:23 AM » These guys are behind it. You can read through their positions and decide for yourself if they're serious and legit. To me, it's a group of Ernie Tertelgte types who know some legalese. https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org Logged I disagree. Circle gets the square.
Alexander Downer, the Australian diplomat who supposedly started the whole Russian interference investigation back in 2014...just got exposed as another Clinton soldier. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...-to-clinton-foundation-report/article/2650772 Australian diplomat who gave FBI tip on Trump aide helped arrange large donation to Clinton foundation: Report by Diana Stancy Correll | Mar 5, 2018, 10:24 PM The Australian diplomat who provided the FBI with information that launched the agency’s Russia probe previously helped Australia donate to the Clinton Foundation to assist in combating AIDS, according to a new report. Former Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer helped arrange a $25 million donation from Australia to the Clinton Foundation that would support screening and medication to AIDS patients in Asia in 2006, the Hill reports. Downer is currently Australia’s ambassador to London and was the one who notified the FBI of a conversation he had with Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos. That conversation initiated the FBI’s Russia probe. Papadopoulos pleaded guilty last year to misleading FBI agents concerning his contacts with Russians. According to the Australian Foreign Ministry, the grant went to assist those in Asia receive anti-retroviral AIDS medication and was processed like other annual foreign aid awards. Lawmakers claim the FBI did not inform Congress about Downer’s involvement with the donation, raising concerns about the FBI for some Republicans. “The Clintons’ tentacles go everywhere. So, that’s why it’s important,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, a member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. “We continue to get new information every week it seems that sort of underscores the fact that the FBI hasn’t been square with us.” Special counsel Robert Mueller, along with several other congressional panels, are investigating if the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin during the 2016 election.
http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/201...l-clintons-cosy-no-tender-necessary-deal.html Alexander Downer and Bill Clinton's cosy no-tender-necessary deal Friday, 19 January 2018 This is the Honourable Alexander Downer. And here he is with Bill Clinton in Sydney on 22 February 2006. Bill was unwell. In July 2006 a Funding Agreement was signed between the government of Australia and CHAI 1 August 2006 - start date of the PNG Contract as per the Evaluation Report 14 August 2006 - purported start date of the contract according to Austender*. The AUSTENDER website is responsible for publishing contractual events as soon as practical after each occurrence. While the website records the contract as starting on 14 August 2006, Austender did not have any advice from the contracting agency, DFAT to publish the contractual details until 3 years later. That's a very untidy arrangement, leaving lots of room for allegations about backdating etc. On or about 20 August 2006 a notice, purporting to be a bona fide invitation to tender for the contract already awarded to the Clinton Foundation was published to the DFAT website. Inviting tenders for a contract that has already been given meets the criminal points of proof for Obtaining a Financial Advantage (for self or another) by Deception. It's a cover up, something that is not what it purports to be. On the papers it appears a pretence was made at advertising a call for tenders after the contract, in whatever form it originally took had been awarded. If this was a construction company run by a mate of the Minister it would be investigated on the spot. It's clearly deceptive conduct. If the Clinton Foundation received a financial advantage (clearly it did in a $15M uncontested contract) the people who did the deceiving will be in the frame for fraud charges, ie those responsible for the overall decision to defy the process by improperly awarding the Clintons work they weren't entitled to. ON 20 August 2006 the US web.archive.org organisation visited the DFAT website and archived a precise and perfect duplicate of what it displayed on that day. http://web.archive.org/web/20060820004845/http://www1.ausaid.gov.au/Tenders/displayetender.aspx?TID=028/06 The links still operate
http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/...larys-server-hack-consent-obama-digenova-says Former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Joe diGenova said Tuesday that key Obama administration officials ignored reports of a possible breach of Hillary Clinton's private email server in order to protect the 2016 presidential candidate. DiGenova said that not only did FBI Agent Peter Strzok and then-Director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper ignore the possible hack, but that they did so "with the consent of the president (Obama)." Tucker Carlson said technicians found discrepancies in metadata contained in the email server, which may indicate it was hacked or tampered with. DiGenova said that when Clapper found out the server may have been compromised, he was required by law to do a "damage assessment" to ascertain whether hacking occurred. The former prosecutor said Clapper did no such thing, and that such action may have provided cover for Strzok - who was working on the related FBI investigation - to decline to investigate further as well. DiGenova also agreed with Reps. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) and Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) that a second special counsel is needed in order to properly investigate alleged FISA court abuses.
He did not supposedly start the Russian interference investigation and the Washington Examiner is not a credible news source. The Examiner used to be owned by the Moonies so do you really trust it to be accurate? I don't.
