Politics Oregon assault weapons ban petitioners turn in signatures

While he's correct it is an insult to point it out.

 

I think Nate was referring to the generalized case.

 

You should clarify this to apply only to those laws the Supreme Court has not reviewed or rejected for review.

 

I'm sorry, where does the Constitution guarantee any of us the right to keep and bear an atomic bomb? This means you can set limits. The only argument is what are the maximum limits.

 

A lot of things "can be done" because of our corrupt system of government.

Does that make it right?

Do you think that companies should be able to patent life?

Do you think that the FCC and congress should have allowed ISPs to sell our personal information?

Do you think that the NSA should be able to violate our privacy in the name of security?

Do you think that Trump should be able to get away with half the shit that he has been getting away with?

Maris said that the laws are not valid because they are not constitutional, so your point that they are constitutional because they have been passed previously makes no sense, which is why I pointed out that SCOTUS has struck down firearm laws in the past. They seem to agree that most gun laws are not constitutional. Their mere presence does not automatically make them constitutional, just as many other horrible laws that congress has passed should not be constitutional.

 

Fools do foolish things.

 

Why yes they do, thus the reason they are called fools and why a certain people are a prime example.

 

Are you really incapable of making an argument without using a personal insult? To me, that signifies an inability to formulate a counter argument, and thus you must turn to ad hominem attacks.

 

You can always put me on ignore or not respond to my posts. It won't hurt my feelings. I have yet to see you post much of anything other than blaming a generation for everything. I invite you to fuck off.

 

I don't put people on ignore. It's much more fun to slap around their arguments.

I find that the people who run away from arguments, or tell others to run away, are afraid of having an actual debate.

 

Good luck with that practice. I have yet to see you post anything of substance in this thread.

 

And I have seen you throw around a lot of insults. To each their own I guess.

 

and I have seen you toss out accusations and generalizations of groups of people acting like your shit doesn't stink. News flash. It does.

 

Interesting. Care to give some examples?

 

Nope, and in fact, I am done with this discussion that is going nowhere with you.

 

And there you go.

Run away.

You call people foolish. You tell me that my shit stinks. You're totally okay with lobbing insults and personal attacks, but you are incapable of formulating an actual argument. I find that sad.

 

And the responses to the proposed amendment show exactly why there is not reason to have a discussion with liberal/progressive. They lack the honesty or the respect for the system.

 

Not to worry @Natebishop3, SlyPokerDog is a prime example of an ignorant ass in action. Years of practice perfecting his hate.

 

More personal attacks marzy. Apparently you are the one filled with hate.