Politics CIA, FBI, Obama WH and Dem officials exposed rigging probe

The Benghazi investigation lasted a year and a half and turned up zero.

The Russian collusion investigation has lasted a year and a half and has turned up 30 felony indictments.

This tells me a lot right there.

Anyhow, Hillary, Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller will be indicted any day now.

 

That's a great straight line!

 

You left out McCabe...oh, wait, never mind.

 

It's sounding more and more like an enemies list.

 

Oh, much more than zero, if you paid attention. That is where we learn just how well Hillary could lie while smiling. Just how piss poor she would actually be as Commander in Chief. I must ask, why did you learn zero?

 

it's required to learn all the numbers in basic math....zero is a very important digit

 

So is the 'null set'. It's highly significant in computer science.

Did you know that there's no known significance to the number googol? It's larger than the number of subparticles in the known universe. I'm including conjectured particles in dark matter and dark energy. Also, it's infinitely smaller than infinity.

 

I didn't know that....interesting though.

 

I like to use that to get kids interested in science and math. Even the kid that hate's school the most has thought about infinity and it's relation to our universe. Then I get them hooked on the concept of curiosity.

Kid's like to learn if it's presented in an interesting manner. They want to know the truth about everything. This places their very precious lives in our hands.

 

String theory quantum physics is fascinating to me...I'm not a math guy....just get by but the idea of possibilities is really interesting

 

I'm not into string theory. It requires stepping out of the world of discrete math. Not saying there's anything wrong with it, just saying I'm not built that way.

Edit: Quantum theory just blows me away. It's actually the basis of modern chemistry and electron shell theory. We think of the different electron shells as being at different but discreted energy levels.

This brings up another fascinating point. Did you know that moonlight is only about 2/3 reflected sunlight? The sun gives off constant waves of free electrons that strike the moon exciting some of the valence electrons to higher energy levels. This new level persists for a very short period of time. As the electrons move back into their stable lower energy levels, they give off light. Think of it as a glow. This happens in certain minerals on the surface of the moon. Think about that the next time you look up at the moon.

 

Now you see why many learned nothing, from Benghazi. Nothing is not always the same as zero, and thus, so many are easily distracted.

 

I think you mean in Set Theory. Since Computer Science is a broad field, when writing about any given subject in the field,
you best use the nomenclature of the primary subject. For example, if you intend to convey the queuing theory used by a Data Base manager
in handling units of work from Transaction manager, then you best use the terminology of those systems, not the nomenclature of all the possible mathematical subsets that may apply. If you insist on the pedantic, you will succeed in signalling your learning while likely failing to communicate with users of the target system.

Perhaps a the same is applicable to Benghazi.

 

I know very little of what you farts are talking about. Me and the teenagers of today are more interested in the "hot water challenge"

Trying to figure out who I can pour scalding water on as I type....

 

I think you are making my point. Benghazi isn't that hard either.

 

http://www.bostonherald.com/opinion/op_ed/2018/07/fisa_documents_reveal_fbi_collusion

FISA documents reveal FBI collusion
Laura Hollis Monday, July 30, 2018

Credit: Associated Press
FILE - In this file July 7, 2016, photo then-FBI Director James Comey testifies before the House Oversight Committee to discuss Hillary Clinton's email investigation, at the Capitol in Washington.

Our media’s valiant efforts to distract us notwithstanding, information continues to seep out that underscores how badly a housecleaning is needed in Washington, D.C.

Last week saw the release of the applications used to obtain warrants from the FISA court to spy on Carter Page, an adviser to the Trump presidential campaign. Obtained by Judicial Watch, the 400-plus pages of (heavily redacted) documents support the conclusions earlier drawn by the House Intelligence Committee (and denounced by Democrats as hysteria): the FISA warrants were obtained through obfuscation and deceit.

As various commentators predicted would be proven, the bulk of the information that formed the basis for the FISA warrant applications was the “dossier” of allegations about Donald Trump’s activities in Russia. This dossier was provided to the FBI by British spy Christopher Steele. Steele was hired during the 2016 presidential campaign by opposition research firm Fusion GPS, who was paid by Hillary Clinton’s law firm Perkins Coie, who was paid by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. The allegations were scandalous and completely unverified, in violation of federal statutes and FISA court rules.

In other words, the FBI used oppo research paid for by the Democrats as justification for government spying on a political opponent and other Americans.

But there’s more. In another incredible coincidence, Fusion GPS had hired scholar and professor Nellie Ohr as a “paid Russian expert.” Nellie Ohr happens to be married to Bruce Ohr, deputy attorney general in the Justice Department. Bruce Ohr is alleged to have passed his wife’s anti-Trump research to the FBI. He was demoted for failing to disclose not only his wife’s employment with Fusion GPS, but also his own meetings with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson.

The FISA court was never told any of that. They were never supposed to know. None of us was ever supposed to know.

When thousands of DNC emails were leaked to the public through Julian Assange’s organization WikiLeaks, we learned that Hillary Clinton had abused the primary process, nearly bankrupted the DNC and effectively stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders. We also learned the press played favorites with Clinton, getting her approval before running stories and forwarding debate questions to Clinton in advance. (The official line is Russians hacked the DNC computers and gave the emails to WikiLeaks. Assange and former U.S. and U.K. intelligence officials vehemently deny this, and maintain it was an inside “leak,” not a hack. The DNC refused to turn over their servers to the FBI for inspection.)

And then there is Hillary Clinton’s misuse of a personal email server to handle classified State Department information. We now know that then-FBI director James Comey decided not to prosecute Clinton before the investigation was even concluded. We also know that FBI attorney Peter Strzok rewrote Comey’s initial report to change Comey’s description of Clinton’s conduct from “grossly negligent” — which was a violation of the applicable federal statute — to “extremely careless.”

This is the same Peter Strzok who expressed his loathing for Donald Trump in many of the tens of thousands of texts he exchanged with his lover and fellow FBI attorney Lisa Page. Strzok infamously assured Page that they had an “insurance policy” and that they “would stop” Trump from becoming president. At a congressional hearing two weeks ago, Strzok arrogantly insisted that his bias did not affect his job performance.

He must think we’re all idiots.

But then, we were never supposed to know any of this.

Hillary Clinton was supposed to win. No one would know the FBI “investigation” into her violations of federal statutes was a foregone conclusion that would exonerate her. No one would know that members of the FBI and the DOJ were using their government powers to attack and discredit the man who wasn’t “supposed” to win, but did.

Trump’s unorthodox presidency has been a great gift. It has exposed the corruption in our government, and the betrayal of the American public by so much of the press.

Laura Hollis is a syndicated columnist.