<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Nitro1118 @ May 5 2007, 08:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>You are right, they did look a bit uninspired, but they also looked confused. Game 3 is a perfect example of this. They were taken out of their comfort zones, and Golden State totally exploited every single weakness they had. They played without all of the discipline and precision they played with the whole year, and you have to give the credit to the Warriors for that.</div>Actually if Harrington didn't choke, he could've exploited having a center or Nowitzki guarding him.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mavsfan1000 @ May 5 2007, 03:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Actually if Harrington didn't choke, he could've exploited having a center or Nowitzki guarding him.</div>Even if Harrington played well, I think Biedrins gave enough defense and hustle to where he is as good of/better choice than Harrington.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>no. It's just that the Knicks were one of the top three teams in the east. People knew that their record didn't reflect their talent because their two best players had been injured one fifth of the season each. Therefore it wasn't a gargantuan upset because they were considered a very good team. Once again they were only six games behind the Heat despite those injuries.</div>Ewing was in the twlight of his career and Larry Johnson was good but he wasn't as good as you are making him out to be. You have never once talked about Miami in this discussion, you fluff them off like they were a horrible team and the Knicks were better. Miami had a great team that year. Also who cares about how many games they were behind? Miami had a better record, a better team in my opinion, and a ton of great role players.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (WELCOMEtotheJUNGLE @ May 5 2007, 05:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ewing was in the twlight of his career and Larry Johnson was good but he wasn't as good as you are making him out to be. You have never once talked about Miami in this discussion, you fluff them off like they were a horrible team and the Knicks were better. Miami had a great team that year. Also who cares about how many games they were behind? Miami had a better record, a better team in my opinion, and a ton of great role players.</div>yeah, but there are a lot of teams that win series' when the other team had "a better record, a better team, and a ton of great role players", that doesn't make it the greatest upset of all time. The Warriors are worse than the knicks were that year and the heat were worse than the mavs are, therefore it was less of an upset.
Wait you said the Knicks were the 8th seed because Ewing was injured, but wasn't he also injured for the playoffs? I remember him being injured for the Finals at least so if they beat the Heat without him... unless he got injured twice?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ASUFan22 @ May 5 2007, 06:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Wait you said the Knicks were the 8th seed because Ewing was injured, but wasn't he also injured for the playoffs? I remember him being injured for the Finals at least so if they beat the Heat without him... unless he got injured twice?</div>he was fully healthy in the first round. he got injured in the conference finals
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>that doesn't make it the greatest upset of all time. The Warriors are worse than the knicks were that year and the heat were worse than the mavs are, therefore it was less of an upset.</div>Once again, to prove you're a Golden St. homer, I never said the NY upset was the greatest of all time and I never said that it was better than the Golden St. upset. All I was saying was it ranked in the great upset category as Golden St. over dallas, NY over Miami, and Denver over Seattle for a #8 to beat a #1. That was my original argument and I am sticking to it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (WELCOMEtotheJUNGLE @ May 6 2007, 12:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Once again, to prove you're a Golden St. homer, I never said the NY upset was the greatest of all time and I never said that it was better than the Golden St. upset. All I was saying was it ranked in the great upset category as Golden St. over dallas, NY over Miami, and Denver over Seattle for a #8 to beat a #1. That was my original argument and I am sticking to it.</div>oh, I thought you were saying it was better as saying that the Warriors are in the top three with those two other events implies that the two other events are better than it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Nitro1118 @ May 5 2007, 04:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>You are right, they did look a bit uninspired, but they also looked confused. Game 3 is a perfect example of this. They were taken out of their comfort zones, and Golden State totally exploited every single weakness they had. They played without all of the discipline and precision they played with the whole year, and you have to give the credit to the Warriors for that.</div>I suppose in the midst of my ranting I've overlooked just how well Golden State did play.Still, Dallas equally contributed with their only flaws.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>oh, I thought you were saying it was better as saying that the Warriors are in the top three with those two other events implies that the two other events are better than it.</div>The Knicks upset clearly wasn't as good as the Warriors. I originally said it ranked up there with the Knicks and Nuggets of 94 and 99. My upset ranking would probably go Golden St., Denver, NY.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (WELCOMEtotheJUNGLE @ May 7 2007, 11:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>The Knicks upset clearly wasn't as good as the Warriors. I originally said it ranked up there with the Knicks and Nuggets of 94 and 99. My upset ranking would probably go Golden St., Denver, NY.</div>ok my bad, I totally misinterpreted you.by the way can I get in the support don imus club?
