Damn, Cup, ease up..just showing Lanny where the whole thing came from. I think the piece does a good job of explaining what she did, and she explained why. I personally could care less, but to say that it never happened, or did not help her is ridiculous Was it an honest mistake? Might be more believable had she not been so tight with the clinton cartel
Hahaha, come on, bro, I know you are the King of Sling, but the very fact that Harvard claimed her on the "minority" rolls, shows preference.
Nobody says it didn't happen. But how do you think it helped her (that hasn't already been thoroughly debunked)? It wasn't a mistake, she believed (rightly or wrongly) that she had a trace of Native blood. Not clear what the Clinton connection is, or how it's relevant to a law professor who was not in politics at the time. barfo
Thats ok, I think he may have hit his head too many times..but he and I can talk without the usual liberal deafness or extreme right bias causing a problem..
Obviously gave her preference as a minority the clinton connection would be past performance predicting future actions
What exactly does 'gave her preference as a minority' mean? Did she get better students in her classes? A better office? Higher salary? What, exactly, do you think she got? That's a bit too deep for me, could you explain? barfo
That seems kind of hypocritical. She didn't try to get a benefit, and she didn't get a benefit, but you think it's a terrible thing. Meanwhile you support a guy who literally committed crimes to win the election. barfo
Man, I know you are trolling me, bud, but see, if I dont answer, others will think I am afraid to hahahaha Preference in being hired
don't you love how these trumpets say they don't care when cornered but continually engage in the subject, lol.
What you know is she made an unsupported claim of being of a minority group. You know nothing of any specific crime by anyone I support.
Even without documentation, it is not a crime to claim membership in a particular ethnic group. I do know quite a bit about specific crimes by someone you support. I've been paying attention, rather than hiding my head in the sand. barfo
Ok, that is where you are just factually wrong. She did not get any preference in hiring. This has been looked into multiple times. Here's a good summary. If you want to dispute that, then I'll want evidence, not just "well, I think she did get preference, because that's what I want to believe". barfo
I get it, it can not be proven, but even a blind man knows when he steps in shit. Far too many coincidences both on her part and on the schools part. But hey, believe what you want.