I don't see how. Ratting someone out to the police is not extortion. Arresting someone for a crime is not extortion. barfo
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't raping a youngster illegal? If not, it should be. I guess if it's okay to go around raping children then you've gotta let him go.
Ratting someone out to the police if she demanded hush money that was unpaid would be extortion. She was on a prostitution website (or a sugar daddy type one).
I stated this whole situation sounds like a set up. Either: 1. A group or individual targeted this guy because he was printing 3D guns. Either a gun control lobby or a gun manufacturer or someone with interests in either of those groups. 2. The whore may have found out who he was after having sex with him and then attempted to extort money to keep quiet. That may have failed, which is why she reported him to the police.
This guy has a page dedicated to him on the Southern Poverty Law Center. That is a powerful organization and he is a high value target. https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/cody-rutledge-wilson
Children don't have the ability to make the choice to become a whore, therefor children cannot be classified as a whore. To think a child is a whore is twisted. They don't even have a fully developed brain until they are in their mid 20s. It's even a mistake to say they are sexual adults at 18, but that's the law and we have to live with it. Anyone who has sex as an adult with a minor is a sexual predator and belongs in jail.
I imagine that to sign up for that site, you have to be 18 years old. If she had an account, she lied about her age and may have lied about her age to this guy.
She exchanged money for sex. She made a profile under a sex for money website. Unless she had a pimp forcing her to appear on this site (doubtful), I have very little sympathy for her.
The Southern Poverty Law Center only deal with creeps. I'm sure there was good reason to put him on their list.
A whore has to choose to be a whore and a child cannot make a choice because they are not yet metally developed enough to make that choice. She's a child who did not have proper guidance. Why do I have to keep explaining this to you? Don't you know the difference between a child and an adult?
She's still a whore. And he's still a dumbass. Whether he knew she was of age or not is another question. Like I said, that site is for 18+ and unless she specifically told him she was underaged, then he should reasonably assume she's of age.
At her young age she can never be classified as a whore. That term is reserved for adults. She is a child impersonating an adult. That's the last I have to say on this extremely exasperating subject.
That's an old and obsolete expression. Totally inappropriate when speaking of a child. I wouldn't even use that expression when referring to an adult. Children need our help not our derision.
Dude should have just gotten a real hooker instead of a pseudo-hooker from a Gold Digger website and used a fake name. Amateurs.
