Politics ...this may give Trump the excuse he needs to fire Rosenstein;

Ha! Yeah this is funny. The mod edited my post Lanny, he was definitely signalling you,

 

Of course Trump put Rosensteins name in to the Senate for confirmation as the second guy in Justice! It his his call, but like he said, Sessions is the guy that wanted him. They both failed him badly. But I suppose idiots will see a lie if it makes them feel smart.

 

...Marz.

 

What insulting post? See, the ignore feature works miracles.

 

I've got him on ignore. He's the only one I've got on ignore.

Surprisingly, I find enough good in the others that I routinely disagree with that I don't ignore them.

 

...Trump flat out said that "I was not involved in that process"..." ...and THAT is a flat out lie. He is clearly trying to distance himself from Rosenstein.

 

...I'd rather not repeat it, Lanny. He was obviously trying to be purposely vague and coy as to who he was insulting...seems sometimes that he's trying to get banned.

 

Yep, yes sir, you are totally correct, not that you needed to hear that, but I'm gonna say it anyhow.

 

Best not to repeat it, it's the reason I've got him on ignore.
How on Earth could anyone defend having sex with children?

 

Looks like Lanny is about to fuck up big time!

 

Like I said!

 

we know what you said and it was WRONG!

 

...so you're either finally admitting it was a lie...or, you are denying it was a lie.

...pick one.

 

...why delete my entire reply based on one word used by Marz.

 

...lol, what's up with me?...well, let's see;

1. First, Trump claims "I was not involved in that process"..." (nominating/appointing Rosenstein)

2. But the fact is; "Trump nominated Rosenstein to be deputy attorney general on Jan. 31, 2017. He was confirmed as the second-ranking official at the Justice Department in April of last year."

3. And you even said, "Of course Trump put Rosensteins name in to the Senate for confirmation as the second guy in Justice! It his his call..."






...So someone is lying, and it's Trump. If you can disprove any of the above statements/quotes with some tangible proof, please do so without hurling insults.

 

...pretty much what I thought...you completely deny/discount the facts when they are presented to you and instead, you then promptly and predictably resort to your only recourse which are more insults...the last bastion of someone who has lost an argument and cannot/will not provide any compelling facts to support his stance....how impressive.