Nu uhhhh. Trump said he liked guys who body slam people. NOT ACCEPTABLE EVEN AS A JOKE. THE LEFT WOULD NEVER DO THAT BRO.
This is a terrible comparison. This is not a political hit job targeted at the Obamas opponents who he was vocally and actively criticizing. Also just because Obama didn't say what you want him to say doesn't mean he was an advocate for terrorism. This criticism of Obama is republican propaganda that actually stoked more hate.
During Bush's term, the liberals were just as triggered as they were now. They just can't handle losing, so they start going crazy, which takes the right fringe nutbags out into the mix.
People were upset but it was a different environment altogether, I think your old enough to remember what it was like. Trumps new America is different, now he is inspiring terrorist who agree with him not just nutbags who hate him. He also escalates issues with the nutbags who hate him, Antifa, Patriot Prayer, Neo Nazis and such are a rather recent development on the scale we are seeing.
First of all, I was talking about all the willful lying, not the violent rhetoric as I believe it’s the constant lying that is primarily at fault as that provides a false narrative where folks like the bomber (who was most likely already a violent whack job) can fuel their fantasy-land ideas. But as far as the violent part, no I don’t think the left is nearly as bad. Trump talked of punching the other side and that he would pay for the legal fees of his supporters who got violent towards protesters. The examples you gave - well the only bad one was from an actor. The holder on could be interpreted as violent but I think it was meant figuratively. The others you mentioned weren’t violent in any way.
This is ridiculous. You aren’t aware of Trump literally saying to throw people around and rough them up etc?
Google. You should try it. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...6/trump-cops-speech-gang-violence-long-island
This is what you are screeching about? Police putting criminals in a paddy wagon = targeting political opponents. Yeah, totally reasonable logical path.
