Politics TRUMP SAYS HE PLANS TO SIGN EXECUTIVE ORDER TO TERMINATE BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by SlyPokerDog, Oct 30, 2018.

  1. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,490
    Likes Received:
    27,339
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah let's let the bullshit begin.... They're so good at their jobs... We need to start impeaching some of them...
     
  2. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,281
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm confused by this post. All I was saying was that when someone says, "This is how SCOTUS sees the amendment", that seems like an incomplete statement because I don't think they've ever weighed in on it (past court or present).

    Whether or not some of the 9 current justices are competent or worthy sounds like a completely different question.
     
    MARIS61 likes this.
  3. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,061
    Likes Received:
    30,051
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
  4. bodyman5000 and 1

    bodyman5000 and 1 Lions, Tigers, Me, Bears

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2013
    Messages:
    19,582
    Likes Received:
    13,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Las Vegas
  5. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,023
    Likes Received:
    14,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA

    This is an interesting argument, and the crux on the matter is that they are under "complete jurisdiction" if we look at jurisdiction as "the official power to make legal decisions and judgments". Of course, if we argue that the US does not have jurisdiction over these people - it has no right to kick them out either since it does not have jurisdiction.

    It is a catch-22. You can't have one without the other...

    (*) I am not a legal expert in any kind of way, but if we are using mathematical logic - this argument does not hold water as shown.
     
  6. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,058
    Likes Received:
    24,946
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    This really boils down to - if Trump does it by EO, it goes to the supreme court, and the supreme court can do whatever it wants, so it might well support Trump, given the partisan nature of the court.

    The court is always free to interpret the constitution however it wants, even if it overturns precedent, years of practice, and/or original intent.

    It's a bit of a stretch, though, to think that nobody ever really considered what the 14th amendment meant before, until the great legal scholar Donald Trump came along and revealed the true meaning.

    barfo
     
  7. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think that's where Westphalian "sovereignty" comes in. They may not be able to have "legal power and judgements" (to use your look at the definition), but they absolutely have the sovereign right to not let people in who they don't want. Even the UN Declaration of Human Rights says so in Article 13:
    Nowhere does it state (for it likely would never be adopted) that anyone has an unfettered right to cross into a country other than his/her own. As the concepts of "citizenship" vary from country to country, and therefore aren't an international norm (or law), it seems that the logical conclusion would be that the US government has every right (if it chooses to--as stated, probably a constitutional amendment) to restrict both immigration and citizenship.
     
  8. andalusian

    andalusian Season - Restarted

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,023
    Likes Received:
    14,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Marcos, CA
    You really want to interpret the constitution based on UN resolutions? Because I am certain this will open a floodgate of all kinds of interesting things. I would love to hear Mr. Trumps response to this - I suspect it will be very entertaining.

    Again, if we are going strictly by the language of the constitution's amendment, the standard dictionary definition of jurisdiction and mathematical logic - there is a clear catch-22 there.
     
  9. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. Only Chapter VII cases are binding. I was merely stating that even the UN does not take the position of what you're talking about. This isn't a Chapter VII UN case, and therefore isn't binding.
    No, I'm saying that your position that because we don't have jurisdiction and therefore can't kick them out has zero basis in law, national or international, or normative frameworks--whether or not it seems mathematically logical. In fact, both say the opposite. That's all. :dunno:
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  10. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    There are many laws and regulations that the Supreme Court has never ruled on and many times it's because it wouldn't change anything and be a waste of time. Trump has had many of his self imposed policies ruled unconstitutional already and thrown out. there are procedures in place because of a president like Trump who thinks he is above the law and the constitution.
     
  11. bodyman5000 and 1

    bodyman5000 and 1 Lions, Tigers, Me, Bears

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2013
    Messages:
    19,582
    Likes Received:
    13,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    Except for Trump admitting that people told him he could do this.....
     
  12. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,058
    Likes Received:
    24,946
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Are you taking something Trump said as the truth???

    barfo
     
  13. bodyman5000 and 1

    bodyman5000 and 1 Lions, Tigers, Me, Bears

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2013
    Messages:
    19,582
    Likes Received:
    13,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    Absolutely.
     
  14. barfo

    barfo triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac Staff Member Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    34,058
    Likes Received:
    24,946
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Blazer OT board
    Would you be interested, then, in an investment opportunity? It involves a bridge, and a Nigerian Prince. Ground-floor opportunity.

    barfo
     
    Lanny and bodyman5000 and 1 like this.
  15. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,490
    Likes Received:
    27,339
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Jussayin the SCOTUS is a joke. That is all.
     
  16. Lanny

    Lanny Original Season Ticket Holder "Mr. Big Shot"

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    26,638
    Likes Received:
    16,951
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Elec. & Computer Engineer OSU Computer Science PSU
    Location:
    Lake Oswego, OR
    Apparently they did with Barack Obama.
     
  17. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,281
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hmm...not quite the same thing, but good effort, dad.
     
    Lanny likes this.
  18. BrianFromWA

    BrianFromWA Editor in Chief Staff Member Editor in Chief

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    26,073
    Likes Received:
    9,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think the fact that Russians (and Chinese) have been singled out as some of the worst violators of these, partially because they can afford a fancy vacation to Trump Tower in Miami, (and Trump himself saying since his campaign that he wants to get rid of it), would blow up this argument. I wonder why you feel no one is bringing that up...we know why. :cheers:
    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/birth-tourism-brings-russian-baby-boom-miami-n836121
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.
  19. Lanny

    Lanny Original Season Ticket Holder "Mr. Big Shot"

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    26,638
    Likes Received:
    16,951
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Elec. & Computer Engineer OSU Computer Science PSU
    Location:
    Lake Oswego, OR
    The courts ruled that the cases filed saying that Obama was not a citizen because he wasn't born here, were not worthy of being heard. I think this settles that issue.
     
  20. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,061
    Likes Received:
    30,051
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Because there was documentation that he was, in fact, born here. Not the same issue at all.
     
    bodyman5000 and 1 likes this.

Share This Page