Acosta is no journalist. Neither is April Ryan. Both are juvenile, showboating thugs hired by CNN to harass the President and interfere with the daily dissemination of news between The President and actual journalists. Most of the press corps despise them and the bad reputation they are giving their profession.
Beautiful rebuttal. BNM is right. It's always funny how people who defend the constitution as tightly as they do, always then try to find loopholes in it to silence those who oppose them. Ironic, perhaps.
Acosta never shuts the fuck up, never lets other journalists have their turn, he tramples all over their 1st Amendment rights, and ours. He's a national embarrassment, and he's proof that CNN us Fake News.
You guys are just making shit up as you go. If you wrote "Santa Claus drives a 1964 Camaro SVT"....NOPE is a perfect rebuttal.
No, I meant Amy Whitehouse, although I erred on 2 points. 1. She's a painter, not a singer. 2. She's not dead, yet. Here's one of my favorites from her politically-charged portfolio. It's called Mueller's snipe Hunt. http://amywhitehousepaintings.com/about
Bob Woodward criticizes CNN's Acosta lawsuit, says media's 'emotionally unhinged' about Trump By Gregg Re | Fox News Kurtz: Why president and Acosta both benefit from legal clash 'MediaBuzz' host Howard Kurtz weighs in on why CNN's lawsuit against Trump is more about a PR battle than the law. Bob Woodward, the Pulitzer Prize-winning Watergate journalist whose recent book, "Fear," described chaotic infighting at the White House, on Tuesday criticized CNN for filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration and charged that too many media figures "have become emotionally unhinged." Speaking at the Global Financial Leadership Conference in Naples, Florida, Woodward said "the remedy [isn’t suing the administration]. ... It’s more serious reporting about what he’s doing.” CNN filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration on Tuesday demanding that the White House restore the press credential of star reporter Jim Acosta. The administration suspended Acosta's "hard pass," which provided expedited access to the White House grounds, after he repeatedly refused to surrender his microphone while asking Trump a barrage of questions during a press conference last week. “In the news media there has been an emotional reaction to Trump,” Woodward said. “Too many people for Trump or against Trump have become emotionally unhinged about this.” Woodward added that CNN was taking Trump's "bait" by enlisting high-profile lawyer Ted Olson to pursue a federal case. "This is a negative," Woodward said, in comments first flagged by NBC reporter Dylan Byers. "Trump is sitting around saying, ‘This is great.'” That sentiment was echoed in a piece in Rolling Stone on Tuesday by Ryan Bort titled, "CNN Has Played Right Into Trump's Hands." "Too many people for Trump or against Trump have become emotionally unhinged." — Journalist Bob Woodward CNN's suit alleges that the White House violated Acosta's First and Fifth Amendment rights by punishing him for the content of his speech without providing notice or any due process, although the White House maintains that Acosta was penalized solely because of his behavior. None of CNN's approximately 50 other "hard pass" holders has lost White House access, nor have reporters belonging to any other liberal-leaning media outlet -- although Trump has suggested that may change. At the testy press conference the day after last week's midterm elections, Acosta continued to shout questions at Trump even after he tried to move on to another reporter, and he refused to hand the microphone to an intern who tried to retrieve it. The litigation, which does not fully describe Acosta's actions during the press conference, also asserts that the Secret Service violated the Administrative Procedures Act by taking a final agency action in penalizing Acosta without providing any notice or hearing. The suit, in arguing that the White House was lying about its motivations for taking action against Acosta, additionally claims that White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders shared a "doctored" clip of the episode on Twitter. In the low-resolution .gif clip shared by Sanders, Acosta's arm moves slightly faster than it does in higher-quality footage of the press conference. However, despite reporting from a wide variety of outlets that Sanders had shared a doctored clip, a Buzzfeed analysis suggested the changes in the video could have resulted inadvertently from the conversion of the footage to the lower-fidelity .GIF format, which is commonly used on Twitter. The format produces fewer frames per second than a higher-quality video source, making scenes appear to move faster. White House officials, including Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, have acknowledged that the video was indeed "sped up" during the conversion process, while consistently denying that the clip was purposefully doctored. The lawsuit states that Sanders used a bogus justification by claiming that Acosta had "placed his hands on a young woman just trying to do her job as White House intern." In responding to CNN's suit, Sanders on Tuesday said that Acosta's behavior had "impeded the ability of the President, the White House staff, and members of the media to conduct business.” "After Mr. Acosta asked the President two questions—each of which the President answered—he physically refused to surrender a White House microphone to an intern, so that other reporters might ask their questions," Sanders said in statement. "This was not the first time this reporter has inappropriately refused to yield to other reporters," she continued. "The White House cannot run an orderly and fair press conference when a reporter acts this way, which is neither appropriate nor professional. The First Amendment is not served when a single reporter, of more than 150 present, attempts to monopolize the floor."
The right-wing snowflakes sure don't like it when Trump is treated the same way Obama was treated for 8 years Snow. Flakes.
The first thing I thought of when they said it was doctored was watching TrueBlazerFan highlights. The video is choppy as fuck on youtube for me and other highlights aren't. Then in CNN's own story they lie like a motherfucker about it......https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/13/media/cnn-sues-trump/index.html In reality, Acosta held onto the mic, said "pardon me, ma'am," asked a followup question, then gave up the mic. The above is from the cnn article. Lying motherfuckers. I certainly laughed at people that said he assaulted the intern. He did not assault her. Still, CNN caught lying again.
There's probably legal precedent that says I'm wrong, but my thought on this would be that as long as the government isn't preventing CNN from saying what they want to say, isn't threatening any kind of legal repercussion for their reporting, they shouldn't be under any obligation to provide them--or specifically any one reporter in particular--any specific access. Or to put it another way...in my mind, "Freedom of the press" doesn't mean that the White House has to make information available to CNN, or any other media company. Press conference attendance is not a civil right.
I mean, I didn't make it up. It's literally happening in the world right now. Not my fault some people choose to be blind to the obvious.
Here's what Bob Woodward thinks about Trump - https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/04/us/politics/trump-woodward-book-fear.html
“Fox News supports CNN in its legal effort to regain its White House reporter’s press credential,” Fox News President Jay Wallace said in a statement. Oh my, conservatives everywhere feeling conflicted this morning. BNM
Even a judge appointed by Trump won't side with the liar in charge. https://gazette.com/news/judge-rule...cle_e37b4848-e9b4-11e8-9a23-17ce7d223d4c.html
