Uh huh, until my last post to you which was addressing something you posted my only post in this thread was a gif that said Who gives a fuck. So I'm not really sure "which guys" you think I'm a part of in this argument, lol.
I believe that to be totally correct. Perhaps the President's statement confirming that might be some sort of evidence.
Did you read anything about this or just heard from a guy who knows a guy? He won TEMPORARILY based on the Fifth Amendment claim. Why can't anyone besides Stevenson admit it?
You don't seem to understand what the First Amendment says if you are going to accuse me of not understanding it. So you're lumped in with the rest of them until you explain how I was wrong.
Oh hey... Got your link to work. Just read it and now I know why you don't know what you're talking about.
Even yahoo has more information in their articles. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ya...restore-jim-acostas-press-pass-164619698.html
LOL! This statement is wrong. I assumed you didn't know what the 1st Amendment was since you posted it. I guess you're just bored and wanting to argue. Have fun!
You're a what? Well, excuuuuse me, I guess I'm a bad speller. Just for that, No soup for you - The Soup Nazi
You know the one thing missing from this discussion? A persuasive argument why it is A) ethical to lie, and B) ethical to bully someone who catches you. Even if Trump had the law on his side (and I don't believe he does) he is still a scumbag.
Acosta is such an embarrassment to our country as a faux journalist, but he'd be great starring in one of those "Child's mind in an adult's body" kid-flicks. He won't be able to control himself and he's as good as gone. White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders also implemented a series of rules that will govern White House press conferences going forward. According to Sanders, the new rules are: A journalist called upon to ask a question will ask a single question and then will yield the floor to other journalists. At the discretion of the President or other White House official taking questions, a follow-up question or questions may be permitted; and where a follow up has been allowed and asked, the questioner will then yield the floor. Yielding the floor” includes, when applicable, physically surrendering the microphone to White House staff for use by the next questioner. Failure to abide by any of rules may result in suspension or revocation of the journalist’s hard pass. “We are mindful that a more elaborate and comprehensive set of rules might need to be devised," Sanders said. CNN's Jim Acosta questions U.S. President Donald Trump during his news conference following Tuesday's midterm U.S. congressional elections at the White House in Washington, U.S., November 7, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst - RC189F0AFAA0 “The White House’s interaction with the press is, and generally should be, subject to a natural give-and-take. President Trump believes strongly in the First Amendment, and a free press and is the most accessible President in modern history. It would be a great loss for all if, instead of relying on the professionalism of White House journalists, we were compelled to devise a lengthy and detailed code of conduct for White House events,” Sanders said to conclude her statement.
