The Official CJ McCollum Thread

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by Jade Falcon, Oct 26, 2018.

  1. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,588
    Likes Received:
    56,019
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Has everyone given up on CJ working here? He's got so much skill, but I feel like he's used wrong. I don't see the point of some of these trade proposals where people are just dumping him. He's not that bad.
     
  2. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,402
    Likes Received:
    6,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :dunno: We have 2 guards who struggle on defense and who need the ball in their hands to be effective. I think people are begining to question whether Dame and CJ actually compliment each other that well on the court. If CJ could play defense, or was a better playmaker, or if he was effective playing off the ball, it would make a world of difference. As is, I'm not sure you can say Stotts is using him wrong, as there is no *right* way to use him alongside Dame. He is what he is - a ball dominant scorer of so-so efficiency.
     
    TBpup likes this.
  3. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If McCollum wasn’t making the money he’s making, he would be an amazing sixth man. But since he’s getting paid more than Anthony Davis, he should be making a bigger impact than the occasional outburst, and the consistent inconsistency.
     
  4. oldmangrouch

    oldmangrouch persona non grata

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12,402
    Likes Received:
    6,323
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Amen! Find a more versatile player to start alongside Dame, and minimize the time CJ and Dame are on the court together. Olshey wouldn't do it in a million years, but the Blazers would be a stronger *team*.
     
    TBpup and Scalma like this.
  5. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Easy fix, fire Neil.
     
  6. tlongII

    tlongII Legendary Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,100
    Likes Received:
    11,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Beaverton, Oregon
    It's ridiculous that people in here shit on CJ all the time. The problem with our team is at FORWARD! It's so obvious that it boggles my mind to think people believe the answer to our problems is getting rid of CJ. What is wrong with you people???
     
    illmatic99 likes this.
  7. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If getting rid of CJ could garner an upgrade at forward, doesn't that address both concerns?
     
    TBpup likes this.
  8. tlongII

    tlongII Legendary Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,100
    Likes Received:
    11,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Beaverton, Oregon
    No it does not. Who on this team plays 2 guard as effectively as CJ?
     
  9. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,275
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good question, although the way Curry has been playing lately, an argument can be made for him. Regardless, this question is why the ideas that have been bandied about lately have included both an upgrade at forward AND an able replacement at SG, usually someone bigger than CJ who is better defensively and more apt to play off the ball rather than seek to create for himself.
     
    TBpup, BonesJones and hoopsjock like this.
  10. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    Well there is the problem. CJ is shooting inefficiently, is not a good passer/rebounder/defender, and has a huge contract.

    So I ask you what of that is not replaceable? He can create his own offense, sure. Does that outweigh all the negative stuff though?
     
    TBpup, BonesJones and Scalma like this.
  11. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    The other problem is that it is very difficult to upgrade the forward problem and keep CJ. Of course if there is a move available to do so then you try that first, it's just been 3 seasons without that so for it to happen now is unlikely.
     
  12. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would take a downgrade at shooting guard if it meant upgrading somewhere else, specifically forward. His inefficient 18 shots a game, no other consistent contribution, and huge contract would not be missed.
     
    TBpup likes this.
  13. dviss1

    dviss1 Emcee Referee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29,479
    Likes Received:
    27,329
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've found that emitting negative energy is detrimental.

    But the answer to this isn't CJ or Stotts.

    It's Olshey.
     
    Jade Falcon likes this.
  14. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,588
    Likes Received:
    56,019
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Ya I don't see the reasoning behind plugging up one hole while creating another.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2019
  15. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    I'm all for plugging all the holes. What out there could accomplish that?
     
  16. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,588
    Likes Received:
    56,019
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    Certainly not with salary dumps or Otto Porter. I down for trading CJ. Nothing proposed seems all that enticing to me.

    If we can get something like a trade I proposed earlier in the forum (CJ + Salary fillers for Aaron Gordon and Fournier), it would be ideal. unfortunately, such a deal is not really plausible.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2019
  17. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,600
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Would you trade a 1st Round Pick in the 20s to open up the Full MLE, BAE, and Sign-&-Trade possibilities next year?
     
  18. BonesJones

    BonesJones https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    44,536
    Likes Received:
    38,600
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    So its not either of those guys fault at all?
     
  19. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,588
    Likes Received:
    56,019
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
    You know Neil's track record with the draft.

    You know Neil's track record with FAs.

    Neither is all that great, but one of them is clearly worse.
     
  20. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    So we shouldn't make any changes then since the perfect trade isn't plausible?
     
    BonesJones likes this.

Share This Page