Notice Canzano: Time for Trail Blazers to try to take Anthony Davis hostage

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BigGameDamian, Jan 28, 2019.

  1. tester551

    tester551 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    3,849
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Looking at the past trade opportunities, I'm not upset with Olshey for not closing the deal for PG13 or Butler - it's that the rumored offer is not even a legitimate offer....

    When he goes into the negotiation with the "Anybody but...." mindset, he's not even going to be part of the real discussions. I like CJ, Collins, Nurk, etc, but NONE of those players should've been "off-limits" in a deal for PG13 or Butler.

    It will be interesting to see what the rumored offers are from Portland. The entire roster should be on the table, including Dame (although Dame would be an absolute last resort, without any additional ancillary pieces).
     
    TBpup and wizenheimer like this.
  2. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,706
    Likes Received:
    36,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    exactly...he doesn't make serious offers

    I'm still amused how so many people thought that Portland making all 3 of their 1st's available for PG13 while making CJ untouchable was a good offer. It was a joke considering what Indy was offering, and the 'three firsts' leak look either like ass-covering spin or a GM so damn blind to value he couldn't recognize how off-base he was
     
    TBpup likes this.
  3. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    Steve Smith was traded for with Jim Jackson and Isiah Rider going to Atlanta. Anderson was also acquired in a trade and coincidentally it was Kerr and Anderson coming to Portland for Steve Smith.
     
    Chris Craig and Hoopguru like this.
  4. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    It's getting kind of old having you repeat this over and over. Sure they would've had to use the picks wisely but...

    Would you rather have Donovan Mitchell, John Collins, and Kyle Kuzma or Oladipo and Sabonis? Oladipo had a very average career at that point and Sabonis was coming off a rookie year in which he did very little to show that he'd be a good player? Offering 3 picks in that draft was a good offer, your continually saying it wasn't doesn't change that fact.
     
    RR7 likes this.
  5. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,706
    Likes Received:
    36,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL...why is it that Portland didn't draft those guys?? Indiana already had the 18th pick in the draft and they took TJ leaf, so pretty obviously, just like Portland they weren't seeing the value in Collins and Kuzma

    and the Blazers couldn't have drafted both Mitchell and Collins...it was one or the other

    your continuous insistence that it was a "good offer" needs to account for what else was offered. It's true, we don't know exactly what it was, but it could have been Turner or Meyers + Harkless, or even, Meyers + Aminu, or Harkless + Davis. How is that better than Oladipo + Sabonis?
     
  6. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,365
    Likes Received:
    12,485
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, but indiana could have. Mitchell at 10, assuming the same swap, Collins at 18, kuzma at 24.
     
    hoopsjock likes this.
  7. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,706
    Likes Received:
    36,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    of course, they could have. But they had an opportunity to draft both Collins and Kuzma but didn't, so 2/3rds of that doesn't fly. Portland could have John Collins, Kuzma, and Josh Hart...but they didn't see the value there. They could have Mitchell and Kuzma but they didn't see that value either. If Portland was blind to the future possibilities of those three picks, why would Indiana's vision be any better?
     
  8. hoopsjock

    hoopsjock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    16,302
    Likes Received:
    26,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Business Owner
    Location:
    North Plains
    I specifically said they would've had to use their picks wisely. The opinion that they would've blown it doesn't change the fact that there was indeed potential value in the picks they would've gotten plus you have other factors like then they would've been really bad last year and added a high lottery pick instead of making the playoffs and losing in the first round, stuff like that. I still think their current team has a relatively low ceiling and they should've went all in on a rebuild but that's another topic.
     
    TBpup likes this.
  9. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,706
    Likes Received:
    36,259
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not trying to pick a fight with you or troll you, but when I suggest that Portland's 3 firsts didn't have the value to really get into the deal when attached to one or more of Portland's bad contracts, and you counter by setting the value of those 3 picks as Mitchell + Collins + Kuzma it's not a realistic conversation any more. That's just going all fantasy about the maximum possible value those picks could have had...in hindsight. Portland didn't have the vision to see it and it's unrealistic to expect the Pacers to have predicted the future any better
     
    SlyPokerCat likes this.
  10. Chris Craig

    Chris Craig (Blazersland) I'm Your Huckleberry Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    58,585
    Likes Received:
    58,896
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bob had to go
     
  11. e_blazer

    e_blazer Rip City Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    24,052
    Likes Received:
    30,037
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    Oregon City, OR
    Same old Canzano. He has no idea of what the Blazers are discussing about Davis, but he can spin the yarn as if Olshey lacks the guts to try to make a deal. When Davis goes somewhere else, Canzano gets to preen around as if he knew something when, in fact, 28 other teams won’t get AD either.
     
  12. Driew

    Driew Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,912
    Likes Received:
    3,049
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah I'm sure AD wants to come to a team he swept last year. That makes a ton of sense.
     
    calvin natt likes this.
  13. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,885
    Likes Received:
    6,235
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You people have no clue what he offers or what was on the table so quit talking out of your ass.

    Reading this forum you'd think we were in last place in the conference. No wonder I come here less and less. I get dumber every time I do.
     
    calvin natt likes this.
  14. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Absolutely not last in the conference. Although tied for last in the last two years in Playoff wins....
     
  15. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,885
    Likes Received:
    6,235
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, well in that case I guess we should blame the GM for made up bullshit.
     
  16. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    That wasn't a blame statement and not sure what you are referring to. It is just what happened.
     
    BonesJones likes this.
  17. SIeepwalker

    SIeepwalker The lone sane poster

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2015
    Messages:
    6,453
    Likes Received:
    9,551
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Strasbourg, France
    Fuck your post
     
    BonesJones likes this.
  18. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,885
    Likes Received:
    6,235
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Given I quoted what I was referring to in my original post, I'm a little taken aback that you don't know what I'm referring to...
     
  19. TBpup

    TBpup Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    22,577
    Likes Received:
    34,439
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Investment Management / Financial Planner
    Location:
    Lake Oswego
    Ahh, I see the confusion. You mistakenly took me for someone who has the time to read every post. Sorry, I missed something. Which is what the "not sure what you are referring to" is commenting on. Hopefully my lack of free time doesn't have you taken aback too much. :cheers:
     
  20. noknobs

    noknobs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,885
    Likes Received:
    6,235
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I responded to someone else (with their quote), and then you responded to my message. It required - quite literally - only reading the post to which you were responding to, Mr. 10.6k messages in 5 years.
     

Share This Page