5 man team vs. 1-2 superstars

Discussion in 'Detroit Pistons' started by stephenwhite78, Jun 4, 2007.

  1. stephenwhite78

    stephenwhite78 BBW Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    I am just wondering what peoples thoughts are on the make-up of a basketball team. Do you prefer what seems to be the trend in the west which is 1-2 superstar and three "others" in a lineup, or do you prefer a solid 5 man team?I guess I just cant wrap my mind around all this crazy Kobe talk because I don't want to see Detroit getting burned again like they did with G. Hill and Stackhouse.
     
  2. noballer08

    noballer08 BBW Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I like a 5 man team because they're more fun to watch, but if that 1-2 superstars team has other good players in the lineup that know their role and do it well, then I don't mind that either. Five man teams usually have a few years of glory then a few players get frustrated over sharing the ball and leave.
     
  3. TigerTaylor

    TigerTaylor BBW Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (noballer07 @ Jun 6 2007, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I like a 5 man team because they're more fun to watch, but if that 1-2 superstars team has other good players in the lineup that know their role and do it well, then I don't mind that either. Five man teams usually have a few years of glory then a few players get frustrated over sharing the ball and leave.</div>Yeah, the 5 man team doesn't seem to last as long, because if one, or two players leave, it ruins the whole team chemistry. While teams with a superstar usually lasts longer, because with one role player leaving, you can find another one to give you the same contribution.
     
  4. SunnyD

    SunnyD Sexiest Poster Alive (Yessir)

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    6,405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    If the Cavs win the title, it will be the first one man team to win since the '94 season.Look at the past champions:Miami Heat: 2 Man Team (Wade and Shaq, everyone else is a role player)San Antonio Spurs: 3 Man Team (Duncan, Ginobili, and Parker)Detroit Pistons: 5 Man Team (Billups, Hamilton, Prince, Wallace x 2)Los Angeles Lakers: 2 Man Team (O'Neal and Bryant)Chicago Bulls: 2 Man Team (Jordan and Pippen)Houston Rockets: 1 Man Team (Olajuwon)Detroit Pistons: 3-4 Man Team? (Thomas, Dumars, Laimbeer, Rodman/Aguirre?)Los Angeles Lakers: 3 Man Team (Johnson, Abdul-Jabber, Worthy)
     
  5. CavsRules

    CavsRules BBW VIP

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    3,166
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Boobie Gibson isn't a star, but hes getting the job done. I'd throw him in there if we win the title. Thats a big if though.
     
  6. D-Ball

    D-Ball BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    The NBA seems to have adjusted and the 1-2 superstar model is obsolete. The goal now is to put 3 competent players around the all-world talents. And with the way the defenders are isolating the 2-man game it is becoming harder to hide specialists.
     
  7. D-Ball

    D-Ball BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SunnyD @ Jun 7 2007, 04:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>If the Cavs win the title, it will be the first one man team to win since the '94 season.Look at the past champions:Miami Heat: 2 Man Team (Wade and Shaq, everyone else is a role player)San Antonio Spurs: 3 Man Team (Duncan, Ginobili, and Parker)Detroit Pistons: 5 Man Team (Billups, Hamilton, Prince, Wallace x 2)Los Angeles Lakers: 2 Man Team (O'Neal and Bryant)Chicago Bulls: 2 Man Team (Jordan and Pippen)Houston Rockets: 1 Man Team (Olajuwon)Detroit Pistons: 3-4 Man Team? (Thomas, Dumars, Laimbeer, Rodman/Aguirre?)Los Angeles Lakers: 3 Man Team (Johnson, Abdul-Jabber, Worthy)</div>I'd argue the last two-man team the NBA saw was the 2002 Los Angeles Lakers. 2006: Jason Williams, James Posey, Alonzo Mourning, and Antoine Walker were playing all over the court. It was Williams that got the Conference Championship for them. Udonis Haslem, a role player, in terms of variety of skills, dwarfs the Lakers' bigs next to Shaq in any of their postseason runs. Dallas, the runner-up was a 3-man team (Terry, Howard, and Nowitzki). 2005: This is as close to the two-man model as the NBA has gotten in the last five years. Manu Ginobili, Tim Duncan, and Tony Parker ran the show, but they had a lot of depth with their role players (Brent Barry and Robert Horry would suppliment Bruce Bowen and Nazr Mohammed/Rasho Nesterovic off the bench). The runnners-up were a five-man assault with specialists McDyess and Hunter coming off the bench. 2004: The Pistons had variously-skilled players at all-five positions. Lindsey Hunter was really their only specialist off the bench. The runners-up had a tandem of four most of the season (O'Neal, Bryant, Payton, and Malone with Derek Fisher, Devean George, and Kareem Rush their major role players). 2003: The Spurs were loaded with Tim Duncan, Stephen Jackson, Manu Ginobili, Tony Parker, and David Robinson with specialists like Speedy Claxton, Malik Rose, and Bruce Bowen. The runners-up were a 3-man team: Kidd, Jefferson, and Martin.
     

Share This Page