Schiff and Nadler can knock themselves out playing plan B. They can continue to their destruction with their issues with Trump. I expect he will probably give them the old GFY, if they ask him something. The bigger question is, who authorized Comey to investigate Trump the Presidential Candidate? This level of corruption has never been attempted before in the history of our Republic. It seems Loretta Lynch and Barrack Obama would have both have needed to sign off on the beginning of this investigation that began about the same time they decided not to pursue Hillary Clinton. What sort of evidence of a crime by Trump do you suppose they were presented with to persuade them in jumping off the edge into history unknown? Will someone bring their butt to fire for this folly? I think it is overdue. Perhaps Lidsey Graham's committee can begin to unravel that ball of crap that started this whole mess. Whoo! The 42% has a long back track to make! Remember When everyone laughed at Trump for pointing out that he had been "Wire Tapped"? He was right, They unmasked Flynn and then leaked the information about him. Totally criminal. Hang on! Much more to come.
I guess I should thank @SlyPokerDog for allowing me to post today and giving @BlazerWookee and @EL PRESIDENTE something to like. It didn't make it through the previous day. I wonder now how many days will pass before the correction phase of investigations begin? When President Trump says, this should never be allowed to happen to another President again. I completely agree, regardless of Democrat, Republican, or Green... Corrections required.
Schiff faces mounting GOP calls for resignation over collusion claims By Andrew O'Reilly | Fox News Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff put large chunks of the anti-Trump dossier into the congressional record in 2017; Catherine Herridge reports from Washington. Republicans are stepping up calls for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff to resign or give up his committee post for repeatedly pushing claims of collusion between President Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russian operatives. Now that Robert Mueller's probe has shown no evidence of collusion, White House adviser Kellyanne Conway has been the most vocal in calling for Schiff’s resignation – telling “Fox & Friends” on Monday that the California Democrat “ought to resign today.” “He’s been on every TV show 50 times a day for practically the last two years, promising Americans that this president would either be impeached or indicted,” Conway said. “He has no right, as somebody who has been peddling a lie, day after day after day, unchallenged. Unchallenged and not under oath. Somebody should have put him under oath and said, ‘You have evidence, where is it?'” Conway continued her calls for Schiff’s resignation on Tuesday during an interview on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom,” saying Schiff should be put under oath for claims of evidence of collusion between the Trump team and Russia. “He's saying there was evidence of collusion in plain sight, that he knew of it,” she said. “If he's got evidence, put him under oath.” For two years, Schiff routinely sounded ominous warnings about what Special Counsel Robert Mueller might find on Trump. In March 2017, Schiff told MSNBC that "there is more than circumstantial evidence now" of a relationship between Russia and Trump's associates. In December of that year, Schiff said on CNN: "The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help. The Russians gave help and the president made full use of that help. That is pretty damning, whether it is proof beyond a reasonable doubt of conspiracy or not." And in May of last year, Schiff said on ABC that the Russian hacking of Democratic National Committee emails is "like Watergate in the sense that you had a break in at the Democratic headquarters, in this case a virtual one, not a physical break in, and you had a president as part of a cover up." Schiff said later that the Russia investigation is "a size and scope probably beyond Watergate." Despite Schiff’s claims, Mueller found no evidence of coordination or conspiracy involving Trump, his campaign and the Russian government, Attorney General William Barr wrote in a letter released on Sunday. While not going so far as Conway in calling for Schiff to leave office, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said that Schiff does owe “an apology to the American public” and should step down from his post as head of the intelligence committee. “He owes an apology to the American public," McCarthy said. “There is no place in Adam Schiff's world or in Congress that he should be chair of the intel committee." McCarthy added: "There is no way he could lead the intel committee and he should step back." Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel echoed McCarthy’s comments in an interview with Fox Business Network, saying that Schiff – along with House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. – should apologize to Trump for the claims of Russian collusion. “They should be removed from their chairmanships,” McDaniel said. “They owe the American people an apology. They owe this president an apology, and they have work to do to heal this democracy because this is our country we are talking about.” The Associated Press contributed to this report
The three caballeros that conspired to bring a President down before he was even elected. Did they hatch plan all by their self? Or did they simply follow their leader? They have been hard at work to sell the tale, but it seems, there was no sale! Will they take the fall and quietly go to jail? I suspect not.
Oh, I agree! But he is just snot frosting. Not a real perpetrator like the Three Cabs. I am looking forward to the leader of the Three to take the lime light.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/?sourc...MIxcKosYbd3gIV6R-tBh278A1LEAAYASAAEgIuZfD_BwE Judicial Watch Sues for Records of Communication Between James Clapper, John Brennan and CNN MARCH 27, 2019 Dossier-Related Communications Between Clapper and ex-CIA Director John Brennan also Sought (Washington, DC) — Judicial Watch announced today it has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) seeking records of communications between former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan and CNN around the time the Clinton-Democrat National Committee Trump dossier was being pitched to key media outlets. A House report detailed that Clapper leaked information regarding the dossier to CNN in January 2017. The former ODNI chief signed on as an analyst for CNN in August 2017. Judicial Watch is also seeking records of communications between Clapper and Obama CIA Director John Brennan regarding the dossier , which was authored by former British spy and FBI payee Christopher Steele. Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Judicial Watch v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence and Central Intelligence Agency (No. 1:19-cv-00776)) after the agencies failed to respond to an April 23, 2018 FOIA request seeking: All records of communication, including emails (whether on .gov or non-.gov email accounts), text messages and instant chats, between officials in the office of the Director of National Intelligence, including but not limited to James Clapper, and employees, representatives and contractors of CNN. The time frame for the records request is May 2016 through May 2017. All records of communications between the office of the Director of Central Intelligence and representatives of CNN; DCI John Brennan and DNI James Clapper regarding the collection of memos known as the “Steele Dossier:” and between DCI John Brennan and DNI James Clapper regarding CNN. All records of communication, including emails (whether on .gov or non-.gov email accounts), text messages and instant chats, between officials in the office of the Director of Central Intelligence, including but not limited to DCI John Brennan, and employees, representatives and contractors of CNN. The time frame for the requested records is May 2016 through May 2017. All records of communication, including emails (whether on .gov or non-.gov email accounts), text messages and instant chats, between DCI John Brennan and DNI James Clapper regarding the collection of memos known as the “Steele Dossier”. The time frame for records requested in this bullet item is May 2016 through January 2017. All records of communication, including emails (whether on .gov or non-.gov email accounts), text messages and instant chats, between DCI John Brennan and DNI James Clapper regarding the news network CNN. The time frame for records requested in this bullet item is May 2016 through January 2017. In a March 2018, report, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee said, “Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, now a CNN national security analyst, provided inconsistent testimony to the Committee about his contacts with the media, including CNN.” And, “when questioned by the Committee … Clapper admitted that he confirmed the existence of the dossier to the media. Clapper later admitted he had discussed the Steele dossier with CNN’s Jake Tapper and other journalists in early 2017, shortly before President Donald Trump’s inauguration. In a January 10, 2017 report with bylines from Tapper, Evan Perez, Jim Sciutto and Carl Bernstein, CNN first revealed that then-FBI Director James Comey had briefed then-President-elect Trump on the dossier’s allegations. The Intelligence Committee’s report said that “Clapper subsequently acknowledged discussing the ‘dossier with CNN journalist Jake Tapper,’ and admitted that he might have spoken with other journalists about the same topic. Clapper’s discussion with Tapper took place in ‘early January 2017,’ around the time [intelligence officials] briefed President Obama and President-elect Trump, on ‘the Christopher Steele information.’” Shortly after CNN’s January 10, 2017 report, BuzzFeed News published the dossier in full. The four CNN reporters were awarded the White House Correspondents’ Association’s Merriman Smith Award for their coverage of the dossier story. Brennan, in an interview with NBC News on February 4, 2018 insisted that the Steele dossier “did not play any role whatsoever” in early intelligence assessments on alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Several subsequent reports strongly contradict Brennan’s claim. In a June 4, 2018 report for National Review, Victor Davis Hanson noted that Brennan “served as a stealthy conduit” to ensure the dossier was “disseminated widely.” Hanson wrote: “Brennan, in May 2017, as an ex-CIA director, again almost certainly did not tell the truth to Congress when he testified in answer to Rep. Tray Gowdy’s questions that he neither knew who had commissioned the Steele dossier nor had the CIA relied on its contents for any action. Yet both the retired National Security Agency director, Michael Rogers, and the former director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, have conceded that the Steele dossier — along with the knowledge that it was a Clinton-campaign-funded project — most certainly did help shape the Obama intelligence communality interagency assessments and actions, often under the urging of Brennan himself.” “Judicial Watch is again in court trying to get the truth about the Obama gang illegal leaks and conspiracy targeting President Trump,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “Clapper and Brennan were key proponents of the big lie, exposed by the Mueller report, that President Trump colluded with the Russians. Judicial Watch FOIA litigation is the best hope for getting full accountability on this attack on our constitutional republic.” ###
How long will it be moral, ethical, for Charman Schifft to use his position to continuously Slander the President? He never backs up his claim with a shred of evidence. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/opinion/mueller-trump-no-collusion.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...ence_of_treasonous_collusion_with_russia.html Funny in that article where McCain ask him to prove his charge of Treason, he said he never use the term, Bannon did. Actually it was Brennan. Another to never back up his charges. Schiff has parioted Brennan as often as he had the chance. Is this the standard of morality Democrats now use? I would never have expected this crap from Sam Nunn or many other real American Democrats.
What we have going on is a chicken shit way of using the megaphone of office to foster sedition and avoid the embarrassment of being found wrong for supporting impeachment. The guys have found away to drone on, producing nothing but titillating their constituent. Honest men would support and go for impeachment when warranted, or shut-up if not.
Let's just cut the BS simplistic analysis. It's embarrasing. Pin your hopes on a 4-page summary by a partisan hack of a 300 page report if you want, but it's just that, a simplistic headline grab. For some actual facts - I know you guys hate those! - and an actual intelligent take, look to and ask Judge Napolitano on Fox News.
REP. ADAM SCHIFF(D), HOUSE INTELLIGENCE CHAIRMAN: Without objection. I'm going to turn to our witnesses who are at the hearing today, before I do and as you have chosen instead of addressing the hearing to simply attack me consistent with the President's attacks, I do want to respond in this way. My colleagues may think it's OK that the Russians offered dirt on a Democratic candidate for President as part of what was described as the Russian government's effort to help the Trump campaign. You might think that's OK. My colleagues might think it's OK that when that was offered to the son of the President, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the President's son did not call the FBI. He did not adamantly refuse that foreign help. No, instead that son said that he would love the help of the Russians. You might think it's OK that he took that meeting. You might think it's OK that Paul Manafort the campaign chair, someone with great experience in running campaigns also took that meeting. You might think it's OK that the President's son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it's OK that they concealed it from the public. You might think it's OK that they're only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn't better. You might think that's OK. You might think it's OK that when it was discovered a year later that they lied about that meeting and said it was about adoptions. You might think it's OK that the President has reported to have helped dictate that lie. You might think that's OK. I don't. [14:20:00] You might think it's OK that the campaign chairman of a Presidential campaign would offer information about that campaign to a Russian oligarch in exchange for money or debt forgiveness, you might think that's OK. I don't. You might think it's OK that that campaign chairman offered polling data, campaign polling date to someone linked to Russian intelligence, I don't think that's OK. You might think it's OK that the President himself called on Russia to hack his opponent's emails if they were listening. You might think it's OK that later that day, in fact, the Russians attempted to hack a server affiliated with that campaign. I don't think that's OK. You might think that it's OK that the President's son-in-law sought to establish a secret back channel of communications with the Russians through a Russian diplomatic facility. I don't think that's OK. You might think it's OK that an associate of the President, that the President's son-in-law sought to establish a secret back channel of communications with the Russians through a Russian diplomatic facility. I don't think that's OK. You might think it's OK that an associate of the President made direct contact with Guccifer 2 and WikiLeaks and that's considered a hostile intelligence agency. You might think that it's OK a senior campaign official was instructed to reach that associate and find out what that hostile intelligence agency had to say in terms of dirt on his opponent. You might think it's OK that the national security adviser designate secretly conferred with a Russian ambassador about undermining U.S. sanctions and you might think it's OK he lied about it to the FBI. You might say that's all OK. You might say that's just what you need to do to win. But I don't think it's OK. barfo
Funny, Schiff colluding with the Russians. But more like sad! The bugger is being had! https://news.iheart.com/featured/ru...-on-tape-attempting-to-collude-with-russians/
An investigation has to begin soon into who actually gave the orders to begin investigating Trump the candidate for President for colluding with the Russian. How the hell did that begin? After 6 month of the FBI investigating and two years by Mueller, they finds no evidence that Trump Colluded. Well then, that means they had no evidence to begin with! What the fuck brilliant mind would decide to investigate a Presidential Candidate for no good reason. How in the hell do you expect to get by with this sort of crap? It is like a coup. You have to wonder what the hell Mueller was doing for two years, He has nothing in the end so it was the same to begin. What took two fucking years? Very soon I imagine.
