Trade Ideas Thread

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by BonesJones, Apr 28, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    Now i will openly admit i have no idea if they met and if they did or did not layout papers and i look at it with some skepticism, but i would never say it didn't happen without some evidence.
     
  2. CupWizier

    CupWizier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,265
    Likes Received:
    7,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    retired
    Giving up the draft pick wasn't the dumbest part. Only top 3 proteccting it was the bonehead move of the year.
     
  3. GhostOfPGA

    GhostOfPGA The late great Paul Allen

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2018
    Messages:
    3,222
    Likes Received:
    3,440
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Heaven
    Just curious, would you deal CJ for Butler straight across in a s&t?

    Idk if I would because of age, but Butler is better.
     
  4. RR7

    RR7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,372
    Likes Received:
    12,498
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep.
     
    Natebishop3 likes this.
  5. Reep

    Reep Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,545
    Likes Received:
    3,569
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    South Jordan, UT
    Yes
     
    RR7 likes this.
  6. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    36,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    without hesitation. Butler is only 6 months older than Dame and he's a hell of a lot better than CJ. I think he'd mesh with Dame a lot better than CJ does as well
     
  7. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    22,697
    Likes Received:
    15,130
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am not sure Butler meshes with anyone. Not for long anyway. He will soon be going on his 4th team in 24 months. I would trade for him, just not for CJ. Either way I doubt he would want to come here if he was replacing CJ. The team would not be that great. He has better options.
     
    oldmangrouch likes this.
  8. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    36,280
    Trophy Points:
    113
    maybe I'm confusing you with somebody else, but it sure seems I've seen you talk about how close Portland was this year...'they were in the WCF!!'

    Now, with the idea of upgrading from CJ to Butler (and for sure it would be an upgrade), you say the team "would not be that great". Looks like you're standing on both sides of the fence
     
  9. Pinwheel1

    Pinwheel1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    22,697
    Likes Received:
    15,130
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are correct. You are confusing me with someone else.
     
    BonesJones likes this.
  10. SharpesTriumph

    SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2018
    Messages:
    10,434
    Likes Received:
    9,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Literally every player on the NBA champions including the best player in the league were not top 3. More amazing not one of them was even lottery pick.

    Picks in the middle of the first round can have great value, they also are on cheap contracts so the team can acquire another player in trade/free agency.

    I'm not opposed to trading draft picks in beneficial situations. We did that to add Mason Plumlee which was a good move. But saying we should trade draft picks primarily because they have risk is asinine.
     
  11. glazeduck

    glazeduck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's really interesting, but also incredibly anomalous. Just because it happened once doesn't mean it's the path to follow.
     
    Wizard Mentor likes this.
  12. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    28,938
    Likes Received:
    9,595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    To Portland:
    Joe Harris

    To Brooklyn:
    Meyers Leonard
    2020 1st-rounder
     
  13. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,276
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In :clap: a :clap: heart :clap: beat

    Don't see why the Nets do it though.
     
    Fez Hammersticks likes this.
  14. SharpesTriumph

    SharpesTriumph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2018
    Messages:
    10,434
    Likes Received:
    9,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree it was unusual. But it blows a hole in the Shaq/Duncan championship theory that the key to building an NBA title contender is a top 5 lottery pick, ideally the #1 pick.

    The 73 win warriors won a title without a top5 pick as well.

    The MVP of the league and the MVP of the finals were both picked outside the lottery.

    My point was draft picks have a ton of value even outside the very top of the draft, potentially far into the first round. Of course many picks don't pan out, but many also do, and the ones that do can lead to MVP players.
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2019
  15. Fez Hammersticks

    Fez Hammersticks スーパーバッド Zero Cool

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    28,938
    Likes Received:
    9,595
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Phone Psychic
    Location:
    The Deep State, US and A.
    They're shopping him.
     
  16. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,276
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only thing I can find indicating that suggests that they would only deal him if they needed to open up more cap space to sign a 2nd max FA. This proposal doesn't help them do that.

    Are you seeing something different?
     
  17. OSUBlazerfan

    OSUBlazerfan Writing Team

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    6,914
    Likes Received:
    1,669
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who says no?

    upload_2019-6-28_10-0-44.png
     
    PtldPlatypus likes this.
  18. Scalma

    Scalma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    23,631
    Likes Received:
    34,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    glazeduck likes this.
  19. PtldPlatypus

    PtldPlatypus Let's go Baby Blazers! Staff Member Global Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    34,276
    Likes Received:
    43,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's actually really intriguing on several levels.
    --For Portland, we upgrade both forward spots, put a bigger better defender (Bazemore) in the backcourt with Dame, and potentially open up a slot for Simons if he blows up this year the way some are predicting.
    --For Cleveland, they get a legit star SG to pair with Garland, and get out from under Love's contract.
    --For Minnesota, they get a young PG who can pair with Towns, and allow them to switch their FA focus from Russell to a wing.

    My first inclination is that the Blazers say no, just because CJ is a known quantity, and Love/Covington both have injury concerns. But it's really interesting.
     
    oldmangrouch likes this.
  20. OSUBlazerfan

    OSUBlazerfan Writing Team

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    6,914
    Likes Received:
    1,669
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's why i posted it :). Covington's contract is AMAZING especially after the summer of 19 which i feel will be worse than the summer of 16. Cleveland can't keep Sexton and Garland, i dont think. Minnesota needs a PG as their sniffing around for Russell but cant get him.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page