I was called from a blocked number. The person claimed to be police. I did not know if they were. Since they would not give me a number to call them back and since I had no way of knowing who I was actually talking to I was not giving out personal information to people with a blocked number claiming to be police. I gave the correct response for that situation, give me something in writing from a verifiable entity and I would give everything that I know. He was not or has even been a buddy. I do remember him contacting me via email because he had made some sort of a flag display case for Lanny. I have never talked to him personally. He did come on here a few nights very drunk and post some BS then argued with me via private message when I deleted it and asked him to stop.
Found the email. We're both not remembering things correctly but it was almost 8 god damn years ago. 1. He didn't threaten to burn down your house. He threatened to burn down your boat, lol. 2. He also didn't threaten to rape your wife, I guess that was you. I mean if he had both threatened to burn your boat down and rape your wife I'm pretty sure you would have mentioned that in your email. 3. And now we clearly see why I didn't give any information out over the phone to a blocked number. Here's the email. Again, I never called you a liar. I have proven that. Must have missed it. Actually it's good that I did miss it because now you know it wasn't me that called you a liar. Me calling you a liar isn't in there because I never called you a liar.
He walked back on that statement at the end of his hearing yesterday. He literally recalled the question and said he wanted to rephrase it. Then spouted off some hazy line. He is totally mincing words to obscure any concrete findings (or lack therof) The only person on earth who thinks they have this all figured out is Rachel Maddow, and she’s gone completely batshit crazy at this point and is only cashing checks for ratings. We don’t even have names, faces or identities of the supposed “Russian attackers” that have been charged. We’ve just been told they exist by the same guy who told us WMDs existed in Iraq. This whole thing is public theatre at taxpayers expense, and all it will produce is more here-say without solid evidence. Proceed with the circle jerk.
All I took from all this is, can America please just elect someone that isn't a narcissistic sociopath?
Republicans are hanging their hats on how Mueller looked old, stuttered and wasn’t strong at presenting. He only has about fifty years of information in that head of this he’s wading through and trying to answer perfectly in front of millions and millions of people. How about we stick with the actual statements he made. And by the way, people ridiculing Mueller for his presentation and communication skills but praising lord and savior Trump are theeeeeee dumbest.
It's a common practice to do that, especially when you're a con man. You spin things how you want it to be presented.
Something being missed in all this is that Trump just vetoed a bill that would have prevented Saudi Arabia and UAE arms sales. Page five news at this point, unfortunately.
Thanks for that, at least I know how you came to post on S2, that I once threatened to burn someones house down! I had no clue where you got that idea. I only copied the first bit of that dude's tripe post, to you in the email where I wanted his name. It was indeed the Killing of My wife that grabbed the attention of the Sheriff, OSP and DA. Alright, forget the liar shit, Dvvis did it and I sure got enough from you in the same thread to infer you also did. Dvvis is not in the thread you posted. However, I do not want to waste another moment on it. However, you see, sometimes a man does not need to write or mouth the word to communicate what is intended. It seemed to me that we were at that point again, when you labeled my thread hate speech and closed the thread. Not a thing untruthful in what I posted, there were verifiable facts and then logic deductions in my view as a result of those facts. This all suggested the need for a Constitutional Amendment, at least in my mind. But it did not develop that far. Calling it hate speech, is implicitly also calling it a lie, punctuating the ruling by closing the thread. This must be true because truth can not be hate speech. But, I will adjust my view, you were not alone in failing to get the point, no one else did either. I suppose that is my fault for not guiding it better. But then, it still is odd no one else can see the point. But then perhaps they just do not give a shit. Carry on, I wish you no harm and see if you can let me know when you think I am harming your charge. Perhaps just a nudge instead of closing the thread, deleting the post, or just snark.
