OT Trump Chooses His Golf Court For Next G7 Summit

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
I think this is what is most frightening to me. The blatant disregard now for any law or rule. It literally doesn't matter. They are quite literally, above the law.
 
Been through this fake argument a dozen times. Nothing illegal, cheaper for the taxpayers, nothing to see here at all.
 
calvin natt said:
I think this is what is most frightening to me. The blatant disregard now for any law or rule. It literally doesn't matter. They are quite literally, above the law.
Click to expand...


IMPEACH THE MAN!!!
 
Our resident constitutional scholar / originalist @MarAzul is conspicuously silent on this one....
 
Stevenson said:
Our resident constitutional scholar / originalist @MarAzul is conspicuously silent on this one....
Click to expand...
Thank you, I appreciate the acknowledgment.
But I will wait to see what shakes. I don't know what Trump is doing, but I am sure we shall see. Perhaps it's simple, he thinks Camp David stinks!:dunno:

But then on the other hand, worry about emolument in respect to the G7 seems like chicken shit to me.

" No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit
or Trust under them, shall,without the Consent of the Congress,accept of any present, Emolument,
Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

Even if you go clear back to the Federalist papers it doesn't seem it really is a problem either. I mean, I doubt any of the world leaders will make Trump a Duke or ...
https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/68/emoluments-clause
https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/68/emoluments-clause
Then Federalist 39 touches on the subject, but, geez rather irrelevant.

In fact, I guess I can't see that receiving payment for the cost of a room, suite, or Villa is an emolument. Seems like it is ripe to test in court if needed.
 
MarAzul said:
Thank you, I appreciate the acknowledgment.
But I will wait to see what shakes. I don't know what Trump is doing, but I am sure we shall see. Perhaps it's simple, he thinks Camp David stinks!:dunno:

But then on the other hand, worry about emolument in respect to the G7 seems like chicken shit to me.

" No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit
or Trust under them, shall,without the Consent of the Congress,accept of any present, Emolument,
Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

Even if you go clear back to the Federalist papers it doesn't seem it really is a problem either. I mean, I doubt any of the world leaders will make Trump a Duke or ...
https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/68/emoluments-clause
Then Federalist 39 touches on the subject, but, geez rather irrelevant.

In fact, I guess I can't see that receiving payment for the cost of a room, suite, or Villa is an emolument. Seems like it is ripe to test in court if needed.
Click to expand...

Its illegial.

Hes a corrupt person who resides in the white house.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
Golf court? You mean miniature golf?
Click to expand...
I've got a cousin in Georgia who once proclaimed that another cousin of ours had all kinds of golf trophies. My dad who loved golf was impressed and asked about the trophies. Then, my cousin said it was for miniature golf. It was all I could do to not fall down on the floor rolling with laughter. Damn, I had to keep a straight face.
 
MarAzul said:
Thank you, I appreciate the acknowledgment.
But I will wait to see what shakes. I don't know what Trump is doing, but I am sure we shall see. Perhaps it's simple, he thinks Camp David stinks!:dunno:

But then on the other hand, worry about emolument in respect to the G7 seems like chicken shit to me.

" No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit
or Trust under them, shall,without the Consent of the Congress,accept of any present, Emolument,
Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

Even if you go clear back to the Federalist papers it doesn't seem it really is a problem either. I mean, I doubt any of the world leaders will make Trump a Duke or ...
https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/68/emoluments-clause
Then Federalist 39 touches on the subject, but, geez rather irrelevant.

In fact, I guess I can't see that receiving payment for the cost of a room, suite, or Villa is an emolument. Seems like it is ripe to test in court if needed.
Click to expand...

If it was a Democrat you would be all over it, saying how unconstitutional it was.
 
it would be really interesting to have a logical and honest conservative Trump supporter in here, to balance out the left.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SlyPokerDog
Politics Trump is trying to change how the midterm elections are conducted
Replies
0
Views
100
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog
Politics Project 2025/Agenda 47/Behind the Curtain: Trump allies pre-screen loyalists for unprecedented power
8 9 10
Replies
273
Views
17K
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog
Politics GW Bush, Obama, Trump, the story of Ukraine & Fiona Hill
Replies
12
Views
680
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog
Further
Politics Trump reverses course and says his Florida resort won't be used for G7 summit
Replies
12
Views
534
The Professional Fan
The Professional Fan
SlyPokerDog
Politics Worried Trump could 'go rogue,' Milley took top-secret action to protect nuclear weapons
2 3
Replies
67
Views
5K
Lanny
Lanny

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top