like I said before, you just try to play it off, which is entirely okay, even tho "the perfect sense" that you said has happened numerous times with different texts. Plus, it's pretty hard to tell humor and sarcasm through text.
I gotta agree that only God knows when it's really the end, but I can only speak for myself because I don't know if your all christians. All I know is, with the world heading in the direction that we're going, there's not going to be a future and this 12/22/12 thing might actually happen. But something's got to change...
Bush is ANTICHRIST!!http://www.bushisantichrist.com/<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>He snorted cocaine ... He dodged the draft....His friends knew him as an alcoholic womanizer with a bad temper....a complete failure at business until his wealthy friends bailed him out. Yet within a few short years he was elected Governor of Texas, and quickly catapulted into the White House, in spite of losing the popular vote. He was re-elected with last minute help from Osama Bin Laden, in spite of high disapproval ratings. He still couldn't think his way out of a wet paper bag .....and yet he's declared an endless war and instituted some of the most radical political changes in American history ....</div>Sorry, just felt like posting it lol. The guy who made the site is crazy...
I thought the Anti-christ was suppost to be a charesmatic person? Bush is anything but. though according to Revolations, the Anti-Christ would appear seven years before Jesus. we're going on seven years of Bush....
The Antichrist varies according to whatever source you hear of it. The majority of the descriptions is of a very charismatic person who would sway the people over with what he says, become a prominent leader, and then start his reign. Bush doesn't seem to fit that description (likeable), but some think that it is him (the War in Iraq is the main reason). Other's think that it will be the next pope. According to the prophecies of Malachy that he will also be likeable, but in turn be the devil.In the Bible, it says that the Antichrist will gather forces of like 4 great kingdoms, and fight Jesus and his followers. Supposedly the fight is one sided, the devil is defeated, and then the 2000 year kingdom will come into fruition.
So I watched the segment on the History channel about this. The predictions they have had are pretty creepy and realistic, but I do not believe in this. Mainly because the connections the Mayans have with the devil and under world
2012 will be crazy day. I cant say what will happen as im very optimistic what will happen this day. Its possible we wont even make it to 2012 though with the way nukes are getting produced nowadays. We should have never opened up pandoras box. First swords, then guns, now nukes, next extinction.
The thing is, I watched that special as well. They only show the one side of it,not the other parts. The defense of America is pretty dam advanced. There is a good chance they can spot a nuke flying and at least set it off away from the main target.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PrimeTime @ Jul 7 2007, 12:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Its possible we wont even make it to 2012 though with the way nukes are getting produced nowadays. We should have never opened up pandoras box. First swords, then guns, now nukes, next extinction.</div>hahaha no
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PrimeTime @ Jul 7 2007, 06:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>2012 will be crazy day. I cant say what will happen as im very optimistic what will happen this day. Its possible we wont even make it to 2012 though with the way nukes are getting produced nowadays. We should have never opened up pandoras box. First swords, then guns, now nukes, next extinction.</div>I think you're being a bit dramatic. There has been enough nukes to wipe out the planet for a long time now.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Milgod @ Jul 7 2007, 10:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I think you're being a bit dramatic. There has been enough nukes to wipe out the planet for a long time now.</div>All it takes is one bomb in the wrong hands. Wait until someone crazy takes over a strong military power and half the world is blown to pieces and we'll see how over-dramatic I am.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PrimeTime @ Jul 7 2007, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>All it takes is one bomb in the wrong hands. Wait until someone crazy takes over a strong military power and half the world is blown to pieces and we'll see how over-dramatic I am.</div>I don't disagree that a couple of bombs falling into the wrong hands could be a disaster. However you were going on about how there are so many nukes getting produced now as the reason we're near the end. My point was that there have been a shitload of nukes for te last 50 years.
As I have said before, it's pointless to argue with PrimeTime in world affairs because he has little education in such a topic.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Milgod @ Jul 7 2007, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't disagree that a couple of bombs falling into the wrong hands could be a disaster. However you were going on about how there are so many nukes getting produced now as the reason we're near the end. My point was that there have been a shitload of nukes for te last 50 years.</div>Just because there have been nukes for 50 years doesn't change what they are. I honestly believe at some point whether it in my lifetime or my grandkids lifetime that it will be the downfall of mankind.
There has been more chance of a nuke being in the wrong hands and blowing up the world for years. Just because there is a major war doesn't mean that a nuke will be set off by someone. The repercussions of that attack on a major country like America for example would certainly be the downfall of the attacker's land. It would be a lose lose situation. I don't think nobody will pick up the slack for either side, unless the crime was truly heinous. Like I said before, technology is much more advanced. The threat is there, but it can be stopped.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (l?ckdown @ Jul 7 2007, 12:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Like I said before, technology is much more advanced. The threat is there, but it can be stopped.</div>I agree with what you're saying, but the other side to it is that countries like North Korea don't even really have the technology to get these things working. Yeah, they have "nukes" in the sense that they have atomic devices, but that doesn't solve the problem of getting it to the desired country and detonating it successfully.
I think the media has scared us so bad about Nukes that we think that one going off would distory us all, which isn't even close to being true. The US government sent hundreds maybe even thousands of Atomic and Hydrogen bombs off in the western deserts for years and it didn't distroy the world.The only countries which have massive devistating nukes is the US, Russia, France, and possibly a couple of the former Soviet states. everyone has has H-bombs, which could do major damage to an urban population but not total. the other countries such as India, Pakistan, and North Korea have smaller bombs which many have stated aren't even as powerful as the Nakisaki bomb.We're also yet to see what a nuclear bomb would do in a concrete urban area. both Atom Bombs used on Japan were dropped in cities primarily made up of wood.The biggest determent for a North Korea type country to using nuclear devices is the fact that the US has so many Nuclear devices that if NK were to use one against the US , the US would retaliate with it's own Nuclear divices and wipe out NK. Kim Jong-Il knows this, that is why he isn't going to use one. also, an unprovoked act like that would likely cause him to lose any Chinese Support, than he's just a mad man on a peninsula.Iran is a differnt story, they want Nuclear weapons and will funnell than to groups willing to use them. not against the United States, but against Isreal. Israel also has nuclear weapons and would use them against Iran and Syria, which could spark a huge conflict in the middle east. that is why Iran cannot get Nuclear weapons.
