really? Civilian weapons vs the government? sure they wouldn't weed everyone out and there would forever be a resistance, but if you don't think they cant wipe out the masses with a swift backhand....
thats exactly what would happen. A civil wR likely followed by full on chaos as our enemies jump in to try to take down the great evil america.
I'm so tired of this argument. It's like you think that a resistance would go head to head with our military in a conventional war. That's now how it would play out. It would be a lot of sabotage, a lot of ambushes and snipers and such. You're talking about OUR military fighting OUR people. You think they're going to just start blindingly firing those long range rockets?
No, they'll take you out with a drone, after I tell them your location. Whose side did you think I was on? barfo
Yes, it would more likely be a solitary sniper sitting in a wooden house against a squad of Marines in full battle gear with an endless supply of ammunition. I wonder who would win. I guess you could always use your wife or children as hostages. Yeah, that might work. Whoops, would those marines have access to gas grenades or stun grenades?
Here's the DOJ response to this hullabaloo: I don't think it's necessary to form a militia against the government just yet.
It's our civic duty, as per the second amendment, to form well-organized militias against the government. My cell shoots down Amazon drones as practice for when it's Fed drones.
On the flip side, Kerri Kupec is in the disinformation business, so I wouldn't take anything she says as truth. I am not, even so, joining up with Nate's militia. barfo
By all means, track the legislation if you're concerned. I'm just saying that the intent sounds reasonable on its face.
