Click on it...? Edit: sorry maybe Im misunderstanding are you asking for a news article or something? If so... https://www.newsbreak.com/district-...-threatening-to-put-police-in-the-f-ing-grave https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...threatens-burn-white-house-police-graves/amp/ https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/0...-their-graves-burning-white-house-down-966149
All of those articles or the video don't identify the person. Saying that he is a member of BLM muchless a leader doesn't seem factual or fair. He's a man on a mic talking shit. Hell, I was on a mic at a De La Soul concert once, it doesn't make me a member of the group or their leader.
I didnt label him as anything that was just the title of the video. Its not exactly far fetched though. https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost...snt-happen-we-will-burn-down-this-system/amp/
I never said you labeled him or the video. Burn the system down is hardly the same. ----------------------------------------------- Back in October, during the fight over who should replace John Boehner as speaker of the House, Erick Erickson wrote that, “given Washington these days, I think the default should be to burn it to the ground (metaphorically speaking).” Joe Miller, onetime GOP Senate candidate in Alaska, wrote, “I will endorse the first 2016 candidate to make ‘burn it down’ their campaign theme.” He was in luck. Mike Huckabee’s short-lived campaign ran an ad declaring, “Let’s burn down the Washington political machine!” In New Hampshire Chris Christie said, “I’m angry, too. I want to burn Washington down because it’s so ineffective.” https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-voters-above-burning-system-down/
So he resists arrest. There was a guy who eluded police that didn't get shot. There was a guy who ran from the cops that didn't get shot. Why did this person at this time get shot 7 times, when there are multiple stories about others who have evaded the police who didn't get shot once for evading and running? A resistance of arrest at most should get a taser shot (i.e. less lethal), not 7 shots within range to kill someone. They have a term for this: overkill. Luckily he didn't die, but he will never have the same life again. Because he did something that people who have done more than him didnt get shot for. The dude who killed 2 people didn't get shot 7 times and he walked right by cops. Maybe he should of resisted arrest, then maybe the cops would have done something. See how ass backwards that all is? Its one thing to see both sides, but when you break it down and see how asinine one side is.... need I say more?
I am keenly aware that there are multiple parties who want to profit off of a civil war in the US and have been fine-tuning their weapons of divisiveness for a while. Nothing surprising to see here.
dude on the show cops they have DOZENS of clips of scuffles JUST LIKE THIS ONE. But they didn't get shot 7 times. Unjustified. Period.
A few years back, I needed to borrow a tool from my sister's house. They were on a roadtrip, but I had a key. I walked in, and realized they had set their alarm, and I had forgotten the code. I entered it in wrong a few times. I tried calling them, to get the code, but they were out of cell reception. So, I figured I would just go find the tool in the basement, shining my light around. Cops show up, because, alarm, no code. I walk out. Hey, it's my sister's house. Oh, yeah, probably so or you would have ran. Ok, carry on. Guess my skin color?
Why is it that whenever you disagree with someone, they always become "hard to have a conversation with?"
You wrote this post wrong. Put this first: "no way Blake deserved to be shot seven times." Then all your nonsense about media and sheep will fall into place.
Why don't you research it? Not my job to tutor hostile men who have deliberately chosen to support racism and misogyny, especially since I doubt you're really interested.
So your issue is i didnt say that first? Ive said it many times......And its also said EVERYWHERE. So sorry i disappointed you with my lack of proper order. I felt it a given that everyone knows it is simply wrong he was shot in the back seven times. I don't care to play the echo chamber game some of you like to do in here. I don't pile on and post something thats been said over and over. I try to post things that are not being discussed to open a new avenue. i have said it many many times yet the echo chamber here wants to act as though im condoning it... Some of you just igNore what you want so you can continue this moral superiority complex some of you have. Im not going to say it was wrong to shoot him in the back seven times anymore. Ive said it enough times and for those of you trying to get at me for it, its your own blind fault for only reading what you want to read to continue your false narrative... i am however going to continue to talk and say that this could have also been avoided if the victim would have not resisted arrest. Until that is discussed and addressed, the seven shots in the back is everywhere and its obviously wrong. and its also a wrong several wrongs actually what the victim did. If the victim doesnt trust cops then why did he give then that opportunity. This lack of common sense needs to be discussed too and i don't give a shit if you few moral superior complex issue people have a problem with it. Yes the cop shooting is a bigger deal but how did they get there? From continual disobedient suspects such as Blake. Its called conditioning. some of you can take your moral superiority and shove it. Ive havnet attacked one individual person here for not wanting to discuss the actions of the victim, just shunned and treated like I'm insane for questioning the victims actions at the same time.... some of you have real internet issues Nd must assert your opinion in a way that makes you feel better than the other person? and now the echo chamber will chime in that im off my rocker, all the while dismissing their very posts that prove my point. There are multiple problems here but im telling you if the victims actions are not also discussed then this shit will continue. some of you must want this to continue since your so willing to dismiss the actions that created the situation to begin with. Dont quote me or come at me with your better than though shit unless you want a conversation a out how we can fix the victims actions so the cops aren't put in a position to make poor choices. There are plenty of conversations about police reform and how shooting him in the back was wrong. And i agree with that. But for some of you to treat me like I'm wrong for also wanting to discuss the victims actions and how we can also minimize that, just shows how impartial many of you are and you don't actually want equal justice. If the coos didnt shoot and the victim pulled out a rifle and shot everyone, some of your responses would be, wtf. Cop should have done something. Some cops simply arw in a lose lose situation becausw of irrational and unfair judgements by the masses such as tourselves. I believe as humans, we are intelligent enough to dissect the incident and detail out all the weongs to try to fix. Not ignore some and only fix the others. However some of you are aiding in me losing faith in our intelligence to be able to do so, by treating those that, do as if they are criminal or something.
Then why else did you create this thread? Was it for the veiled attacks and condescension? Or was it just to vent nonsense?
The problem is, it's also been conditioned from the continual over the top reactions from the police, which is weirdly enough far more evident against POC than it is against non POC. I think it's more that people want it to be consistent across the board.
