OT RBG dead at 87

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by RR7, Sep 18, 2020.

  1. Shaboid

    Shaboid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2014
    Messages:
    10,024
    Likes Received:
    13,156
    Trophy Points:
    113
    RIP RBG.

    I want a balanced court!
     
  2. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,702
    Likes Received:
    36,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well, after today it's pretty clear you'll have to wait about 30 years to have a balanced SCOTUS
     
  3. TradeNurkicNow

    TradeNurkicNow piss

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,196
    Likes Received:
    676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    hell
    Location:
    shit
    corpse aint even cold and you've got all the republican vampires clamoring to get her replaced before the election with the likes of ted cruz or tom cotton

    are we supposed to rely on the democrats to stop that? we are so fucked
     
    UncleCliffy'sDaddy likes this.
  4. lawai'a

    lawai'a Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    2,753
    Likes Received:
    2,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    i wonder if mcconell would trade slowing the appointment for a promise to not change the fillibuster rules. a wink and a knod.
     
  5. lawai'a

    lawai'a Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    2,753
    Likes Received:
    2,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The number of justices is Not specified by our constitution is it? The control of the senate ought to allow the process of correcting the balance I believe.

    edit The Constitution places the power to determine the number of Justices in the hands of Congress. The first Judiciary Act, passed in 1789, set the number of Justices at six, one Chief Justice and five Associates. Over the years Congress has passed various acts to change this number, fluctuating from a low of five to a high of ten. The Judiciary Act of 1869 fixed the number of Justices at nine and no subsequent change to the number of Justices has occurred.
    https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx

    edit I wonder if they shorten the bench to say 7 which appointments would be instead removed from the judiciary completely? Both of the most recent? they would sit in limbo until some other administration chose appoint them somewhere else. I kind of like the optics of the payback to McConnell of this solution might provide
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2020
  6. TradeNurkicNow

    TradeNurkicNow piss

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,196
    Likes Received:
    676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    hell
    Location:
    shit
    mcconnell said no to Obama's appointment in 2016, so he can eat my entire dick
     
    calvin natt and RR7 like this.
  7. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
  8. SlyPokerDog

    SlyPokerDog Woof! Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    122,820
    Likes Received:
    122,809
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Except that's not exactly what he said.

    He said something along the lines of if the controlling party of the senate is different than the party of the president then the voters should decide.

    The senate and the presidumb are the same party. It will be enough for Bitch to slam through a SC nomination.
     
    UncleCliffy'sDaddy likes this.
  9. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's true. I posted the tweet because of the "expand the SC" part.
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  10. VanillaGorilla

    VanillaGorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,073
    Likes Received:
    4,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
  11. Lanny

    Lanny Original Season Ticket Holder "Mr. Big Shot"

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    26,638
    Likes Received:
    16,951
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Elec. & Computer Engineer OSU Computer Science PSU
    Location:
    Lake Oswego, OR
    He and McConnell both have said they're going to push through a Trump nominee.
     
  12. ehizzy3

    ehizzy3 RIP mgb

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    10,163
    Likes Received:
    6,339
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hillsboro/Bogotá
    R.I.P. to one of the greatest Americans to live
     
    SlyPokerDog and GoBlazersGo like this.
  13. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    21,476
    Likes Received:
    27,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    She was the shield that guarded the realms of justice
    We will not see her like again
    And now her watch is ended
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  14. Rastapopoulos

    Rastapopoulos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    40,828
    Likes Received:
    25,045
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballin'
    I found out on the big screen in the restaurant I was picking up Thai food takeout. I gasped audibly. I've never been so sucker-punched.
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  15. Sedatedfork

    Sedatedfork Rip City Rhapsody

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,955
    Likes Received:
    4,362
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Seattle
    I really was not expecting this. The world lost a superhero last night. RIP
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  16. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,468
    Likes Received:
    22,166
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mitch McConnell without even this slightest bit of class sends out a statement following her death.
    Of course it could not be simply about her and her outstanding life or achievements. It had to include his political spin

    "In the last midterm election before Justice Scalia’s death in 2016, Americans elected a Republican Senate majority because we pledged to check and balance the last days of a lame-duck president’s second term. We kept our promise. Since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president’s Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year."

    You can read the full statement here.
    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/18/tru...ourt-will-get-senate-vote-mcconnell-says.html
     
    Lanny likes this.
  17. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,468
    Likes Received:
    22,166
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
    Lanny likes this.
  18. Hoopguru

    Hoopguru Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,654
    Likes Received:
    17,894
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If there was another candidate besides Hillary in 2016 we wouldn't be in this situation. I hope dem's dont screw it up again. If Joe doesn't win they dont have anyone to blame but themselves with all the great candidates that were passed up.
    Sometimes you got to do personal inventory.
     
  19. kjironman1

    kjironman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2014
    Messages:
    21,468
    Likes Received:
    22,166
    Trophy Points:
    113
  20. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    23,702
    Likes Received:
    36,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think some of that is true

    there were a lot of democrats (mostly anti-Hillary) who wanted Biden to run in 2016. If it had been Biden vs Trump in 2016, Biden would have won pretty easily IMO

    but keep in mind that Clinton won popular vote by 3 million votes. She got 48.2% of the vote vs trump's 46.1%. And the math is that Biden needs to win the popular vote by 2.5-3% to win the electoral college. He might have to win by 4 million votes to squeak out a win in the electoral college. Why?...because the electoral college is an obsolete piece of shit mechanism that favors R's, rural states, and white people. it's an anachronism that needs to be chucked into the trash can of history

    there was also the factor of Hillary's emails that the R's were able to elevate into a scandal that had no substance. And that was mainly due to the cooperation of clueless national media that never seems to gain a real perspective on it how destructive it's herd mentality is. And of course, James Comey launched a last minute torpedo at Clinton with his pronouncement

    as for all the "great candidates" the D's didn't choose....who exactly? Don't say Elizabeth Warren, or Harris or Klobuchar because the D's can't win if their candidate is a woman, not after Hillary. That's not the way it should be but it's the way it is IMO. I don't even think the R's can win with a woman right now. Not in the USA.

    if women are out, who did the D's have? Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg? The socialist or the gay guy? Against trump? Good luck winning in the rust belt or Florida with those two.

    after all the chatter about how the D's settled for the lesser candidate in Biden, it sure looks to me like they settled on the one with the best chance to win and election that's certain to be unfair in trump's favor

    by the way, the under reported story of the 2016 election was Jill Stein and the Green Party. Their vote totals in the three states that swung the election were greater than the margin trump won by. And remember that dinner in Moscow that Michael Flynn attended? Jill Stein was there too. And the Green Party was just one more conduit that Russia used to divert votes from Clinton.
     
    andalusian likes this.

Share This Page