Politics Amy Coney Barrett 'an illegitimate Supreme Court justice'

Discussion in 'Blazers OT Forum' started by Tyrant of Ants, Nov 3, 2020.

  1. Tyrant of Ants

    Tyrant of Ants Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    113
    .
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2022
  2. jonnyboy

    jonnyboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Messages:
    5,470
    Likes Received:
    4,846
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wyoming
    Not sure you understand what “packing” means in terms of the Supreme Court.
     
  3. Buffalo Custard

    Buffalo Custard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2020
    Messages:
    1,409
    Likes Received:
    1,413
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ACB took an oath to uphold the constitution. She clearly believes her interpretation of the Bible takes precedence over the constitution. In other words, she perjured herself. That is grounds for impeachment.
     
    Haakzilla likes this.
  4. Haakzilla

    Haakzilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,120
    Likes Received:
    6,993
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    SEOWebDesignLLC.com
    Location:
    Central Oregon
    If by illegitimate you mean unqualified and undeserving, I agree 1000%. If you mean like a bastard child, then I'm not so sure -- I really don't know much about here mom (or dad) :dunno:
     
    RR7 likes this.
  5. HailBlazers

    HailBlazers RipCity

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    18,890
    Likes Received:
    15,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    PDX
    Nancy, the new (or old?) Karen.
     
    SlyPokerDog likes this.
  6. yankeesince59

    yankeesince59 "Oh Captain, my Captain".

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2013
    Messages:
    30,025
    Likes Received:
    13,572
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is NOTHING "illegitimate" about ACB's appointment.
     
  7. Haakzilla

    Haakzilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,120
    Likes Received:
    6,993
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    SEOWebDesignLLC.com
    Location:
    Central Oregon
    ...right, technically speaking, because there are no explicit requirements in the U.S. Constitution for a person to be nominated to become a Supreme Court justice. No age, education, job experience, or citizenship rules exist. In fact, according to the Constitution, a Supreme Court justice does not need to even have a law degree.
     
    Tyrant of Ants likes this.
  8. yankeesince59

    yankeesince59 "Oh Captain, my Captain".

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2013
    Messages:
    30,025
    Likes Received:
    13,572
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Technically speaking vs legally speaking...I'll stick with legally.
     

Share This Page