Rumor What's going on in Portland?

lol....

 

Then you missed some.
Straight up.
Will you eat crow when i quote a couple posts saying as much?


Doubt it... lol.

 

oh grfo. I attack shit straight up front and center. I dont make posts a out people without quoting them unless im mocking thier behavior.

turn that damn mirror on yourself. But then you also exhibit passive aggressive behavior so your response is typical.
Thats some funny shit right there.
You are another who never admits he is wrong. Just moves on dismisses etc.

So i expect the same from you and your echo chamber.

a fan of passive aggressive behavior is goign to defend others who also behave in the same manner.

lol.

sooo predictable. And sooo easy.

i win again!

 

What the fuck are you winning, and what is so easy? You can't even have a conversation, but then constantly whine about how the whole forum is full of people trying to get one over on someone. And you cry about how two wrongs don't make a right while also saying it's exactly what you do when someone doesn't meet some certain respect threshold you demand. It's really gotten quite sad.

 

I looked and saw nothing. I think I'm a ghost?

 

If you quote the post there isn't much left for me to do. Eating crow means to be humiliated. You supporting your claims will not humiliate me, so I guess I'm just not sure what you're asking for... You're just throwing claims around and nobody knows what you're talking about. You've posted no evidence, so I'm not sure how else to respond to you. Just find me one post saying somebody beating another person or people burning buildings down should be immune to legal recourse.

 

"We're going to win so much, folks, you're gonna get tired of winning."

 

Huh? When is eating crow humiliating?


Its admitting being wrong. If you cant handle that and it humiliates you then... i dunno what to say.

why ask me to do something that you have openly admitted even if presented with, you will just deny and wont admit you are wrong?

this is seriously funny.

 

guy doesnt quote me but posts passive aggressively to me and says i cant have a conversation?


Lmao.
Again. Too easy. You are right. Im unable to have a conversation with passive aggressive people who openly deny things when presented to them.
Easy as slicing warm butter. But keep tryin....lol.
Sad is being so weak minded you have to post to someone without quoting them so you arent speaking “directly to them” but are anyhow in a passive aggressive way.

get back to me when you grow some and i might take your bs a bit more seriously.

its hilarious and comical until then.


i win again! And im playing by your rules!!!! Lol.

 

See the top result... Again, you supporting your case doesn't prove me wrong, doesn't humiliate me, and doesn't defeat me. I'm simply asking you to support your case before we continue with a conversation, so that I know what we are actually conversing about.

If you support your case I'll be glad to engage in the conversation. If you don't I'll just have to assume this is just another antifa boogie monster fantasy...

 

but you already said no one said that. So you already know. And when asked if presented with evidence to the contrary you said you wouldn't admit it.
And you want me to attempt to continue to have a conversation?

lol.

 

He didn't say he wouldn't admit it. He clearly has a different interpretation of what eating crow is than you do. But you zip right past that and double down on saying that he won't admit he was wrong.
And YOU want to complain about spin? Seriously. I dont know if you're doing it intentionally or just can't follow a conversation to be honest

 

Spin?

what does eating crow mean other than to admit being wrong aBout something?

if it means something else, ill admit it because im that kind of guy. Just like when i was made aware ignorant means more than unknowing.
So tell me whats so humiliating about admitting being wrong?

what interpretation of eating crow differs from meaning admitting being wrong??

Im truly not sure if you do these things on purpose or if you actually honestly believe what you say.
Your spinning for a spinner now.

lol.


Im the only one i know of around here who debates with me who can admit when they are wrong. Ive proven many here wrong in the past and merely get the silent treatment.

you have even done it.
Now go back to your huddle with your echo chamber and come up with another play i will defend successfully.


Its amazing how hard it is for many here to admit being wrong. Its like impossible for some of you.
Cracks me up because to me its a major sign of weakness.

 

It's becoming apparent why you're so frustrated if you're trying to converse using alternate meanings to commonly used words and phrases. Since you seem unable to click the link I posted I have included the definition of "to eat crow" below. I don't know how you supporting your case could in any way defeat me or humiliate me so I'm not sure what you're asking for. But we can not get further in the conversation unless you're willing to support your claims with some evidence. Since you are unwilling to support your claims, I'm afraid we're at an impasse.

To eat crow
phrase of crow

1. INFORMAL•NORTH AMERICAN
   be humiliated by having to admit one's defeats or mistakes.

 

also. He didn't say he WOULD admit it. But you just zip right past that too Dont you?


Lol.

this shits too easy.

 

never new it was humiliating to admit ones mistake.
I dont know why that would ever be humiliating to anyone but i was wrong.

i also didnt see a link or missed it?


At any rate. On S2 many have used eat crow as a way to say they will admit being wrong.
If you want to argue semantics fine. Dont eat crow. Would you admit to being wrong?


The frustration is there are common words used all the time, but then if i use it its literal all of a sudden.

cracks me up the goalpost shifting.

my point a along is hardly anyone here admits to being wrong when present with evidence.

are you different?

frustration is too many people focus and argue semantics rather than the actual point. much like you arguing Bout not wanting to be humiliated when its clearly evident based on context i meant admit being wrong. Not be humiliated.

 

Admit what? If you quote the post I'll certainly admit that you quoted an actual post. If you quote something that proves me wrong I'll certainly admit I'm wrong. However, I haven't made any claims other than assuming nobody in this thread wants violent arsonists to be immune from the law. I'd be surprised to find out that anybody said that, but sure, if you quoted their statement I'd admit they said it. Why would that even be in question?

 

See thats how eating crow and admitting being wrong works.

ill give kudos to anyone here who can be stand up about also being wrong.
Ill just continue to joke and mock those who cant.


im soooo humiliated now. Lol.


Not....

 

you keep claiming arson Only, when i said vandalism from the get go. I see you are already moving the goal posts so you can claim being correct when i find posts of people saying you are on the wrong side if condemning the vandalism.
Seems you Re already prepRing for me to quote posts stating we just kneed to let them vent etc.