The Play-In: Should it Be Permanent?

Discussion in 'Portland Trail Blazers' started by wizenheimer, May 13, 2021.

  1. tlongII

    tlongII Legendary Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,251
    Likes Received:
    11,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Beaverton, Oregon
    Fuck no. You’re either in or you’re out. It’s dumb.
     
  2. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    16,437
    Likes Received:
    17,744
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For me I think the play-in tournament is pure bullshit. The post above says if you're in, you're in. I think both of us are change averse and we will get used to it... but I don't like it.

    That being said they should definitely keep doing it. It keeps markets more engaged for longer. It keeps less teams from tanking. It just keeps competition going which makes the product better overall. Most of all is that last argument you made for doing it and that is the only thing that matters. The NBA is a business and this thing makes it more money... so they have to keep doing it. It's their fiduciary duty to the owners.
    [​IMG]
     
    Phatguysrule likes this.
  3. PCmor7

    PCmor7 Generational Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    7,975
    Likes Received:
    11,809
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Saying this for years
    I like this.
     
  4. GDiama

    GDiama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    1,565
    Likes Received:
    1,398
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As an NBA fan I like it much better because there is more teams with motivation. Look at the Wizards for example, they went on a crazy good run while the previous seasons they would be one more tanking team. Or the Bulls traded for Vucevic. It backfired, but they did something to win and not just try to lose more games. I don't see the downside in that.

    Maybe they can impose some restrictions like 4 games back max. I check the standings and Wizards are 1 game back from 8th place. Spurs are 4 games back. I would say that should be the max. If it's only 1 team making the cut then have them play against 8th team and 7th goes to playoffs directly.
     
  5. Mediocre Man

    Mediocre Man Mr. SportsTwo

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    44,783
    Likes Received:
    27,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Isn’t the normal 82 game regular season the play in tournament?

    asinine
     
    Road Ratt, riverman and THE HCP like this.
  6. illmatic99

    illmatic99 formerly yuyuza1

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    57,713
    Likes Received:
    56,216
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NYstateofmind
  7. Fairly-Hard

    Fairly-Hard Former Member Gone New!

    Joined:
    May 2, 2021
    Messages:
    9,062
    Likes Received:
    7,413
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Currently the apartment in the Moda
    I have to admit less teams are resting players. On the other hand we always have a number of teams trying to get into the playoffs or fighting for position at the end of the season.
    What i don't like is the extra 4 days rest teams 1-6 will get over the 7 and 8th seed. That was never the case before.
     
  8. Road Ratt

    Road Ratt King of my own little world

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2015
    Messages:
    5,089
    Likes Received:
    3,963
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    A fruitloop daydream
    No. There should be no mini-playoff for a team just to be able to make the playoffs. It should remain as it was before. No team should have their playoff hopes dashed by playing well enough all year to make the playoffs just to miss them by some stupid play-in tournament.
     
  9. handiman

    handiman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,881
    Likes Received:
    3,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I was toying with the idea of the best balance being the top-4 teams also play for seeding, but that seems like a bloodbath that no one would support. It would address your concern, though.
     
    Fairly-Hard likes this.
  10. THE HCP

    THE HCP NorthEastPortland'sFinest

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    71,525
    Likes Received:
    60,279
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    N.E.P.
    I have a great reply to this........ unfortunately you will have to DM me of you want to see it. Have bills I need to pay and don't want to lose my job. Sorry.
     
    Tyrant of Ants likes this.
  11. tlongII

    tlongII Legendary Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,251
    Likes Received:
    11,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Beaverton, Oregon
    Nah dude. I don’t want any dick pics.
     
  12. KSF-ERIC

    KSF-ERIC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2019
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    6,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thing is, Washington may actually get the 8th seed outright and wouldn't have needed the play-in. But I'm def for the play-in.
     
  13. GDiama

    GDiama Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    1,565
    Likes Received:
    1,398
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They did after all,but i believe they would have quitted mentally way earlier if the didn't have to hope for the playin. Pacers collapsed though and Hornets got many injuries so Wizards managed to get 8th.
     
  14. KSF-ERIC

    KSF-ERIC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2019
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    6,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hard to believe Beal and Westbrook would've quit but we'll never know.
     
  15. crandc

    crandc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    22,874
    Likes Received:
    29,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. Made sense this year with short schedule. Normally every team in a conference has same schedule. True, Team A might play the Lakers with LeBron and Team B without but still schedules are equivalent. With short schedule not so play-in rectifies any statistical anomalies. In an 82 game season you have a pretty good idea who the top 8 teams are. Only modification I could consider is top 16 teams regardless of conference, to eliminate situation where one conference can have two losing teams in playoffs and the other have two winning teams in lottery.
     
  16. KSF-ERIC

    KSF-ERIC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2019
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    6,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s even. Every team played every team in their conference 3 times, and every team in the other conference twice. That’s actually more fair than 82 games schedule where you play some teams three times and others 4 times.
     
  17. KSF-ERIC

    KSF-ERIC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2019
    Messages:
    8,659
    Likes Received:
    6,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So they just showed the schedule on ESPN. Warriors/Lakers or Blazers and Grizzlies/Spurs will be on Wednesday. The game to decide the 8th seed will be on Friday. I guess the East games will be on Tuesday and Thursday.
     
  18. blazerkor

    blazerkor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    16,437
    Likes Received:
    17,744
    Trophy Points:
    113
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    I'd bet that it's here to stay.
     
  19. riverman

    riverman Writing Team

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2013
    Messages:
    68,346
    Likes Received:
    67,394
    Trophy Points:
    113
    THIS!!!!!
     
    RickyJoe and Road Ratt like this.
  20. wizenheimer

    wizenheimer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    24,724
    Likes Received:
    37,618
    Trophy Points:
    113
    not only do I like the play-in concept, I really like the 72 game season and the tiebreak system. Keep both and modify the draft lottery
     
    Phatguysrule and Tyrant of Ants like this.

Share This Page