Breakout year for Brady?

Discussion in 'AFC East' started by SportsTicker, Aug 6, 2005.

  1. SportsTicker

    SportsTicker News Feed

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Just look at the people he will be throwing too. TE: Daniel GrahamBen WatsonChristan FauriaJed WeaverWR: Deion BranchDavid GivensDavid TerrellP.K SamTroy BrownBethel JohnsonTim DwightRB: Corey DillonKevin FaulkCedric CobbsFB: Patrick PassKyle EckelI think for one year Brady will put up huge numbers with all this talent around him. It's will be interesting to see how he shares the ball with players like Branch/Graham/Givens and then he needs to include youngsters Sam/Watson and Johnson..not to mention David Terrell.
     
  2. SportsTicker

    SportsTicker News Feed

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    They might do good, again. The Patriots have true talent.
     
  3. Cowboys In 06

    Cowboys In 06 NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2005
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    He puts up huge numbers every year... and it's not like it matters. He has the rings.
     
  4. AdropOFvenom

    AdropOFvenom BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    11,586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Actually, he only really puts up mediocre numbers, but he gets the wins.But the key thing you are missing is a new offensive coordinator. And the reason that that is that big a deal is because the past few years the Patriots have relied on excellent playcalling and gameplanning, and then good execution of the game plan. The offensive coordinator is directly responseable for the gameplanning and playcalling and with a change, even if they are planning the same ideas, it will not be done the same, and probably not as well.Not to mention the defense will probably struggle without Crennell, Law, Bruschi, and Johnson. And with the defense on the field more often, the offense will have less plays and less opportunities to do whats needed, nevermind build up stats.PS: Its the exact same staff as last year except subtract David Patten and add David Terrell(proven bust) and Tim Dwight who is only going to be a returner probably.
     
  5. SportsTicker

    SportsTicker News Feed

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Now it's not. They have Ben Watson, Terrell who is not a proven bust, Sam who was hurt, Branch who was hurt. There getting people back. I think they will do fine on defense, they got Seymour back and Johnson wouldn't have started anyways. We still have Chad Brown and Mike Vrabel who is going to play the inside, and Mcginest and Colvin on the outside. Law isn't anything to miss because we won without him, we had Randall Gay carry us and now we got Chad Scott, Duane Starks, Ellis Hobbs and a returning Tyrone Poole to back him up and help him out. The Offensive coordinator might be a issue but I don't think it will, the Pats looked great in traning camp with all RB and WR drills. I'm dying to see them play against the Bengals this friday, it will be interesting.
     
  6. pAts_fAn

    pAts_fAn NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2005
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    I think the Pat's have a chance of winning the Super Bowl again and Brady will or might have better numbers but these are new people so you never know
     
  7. SportsTicker

    SportsTicker News Feed

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Please don't say they will win the Superbowl, Venom will come in here and "try" and bash the Pats.
     
  8. Cowboys In 06

    Cowboys In 06 NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2005
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (V?n0m @ Aug 6 2005, 12:50 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Actually, he only really puts up mediocre numbers, but he gets the wins.But the key thing you are missing is a new offensive coordinator. And the reason that that is that big a deal is because the past few years the Patriots have relied on excellent playcalling and gameplanning, and then good execution of the game plan. The offensive coordinator is directly responseable for the gameplanning and playcalling and with a change, even if they are planning the same ideas, it will not be done the same, and probably not as well.Not to mention the defense will probably struggle without Crennell, Law, Bruschi, and Johnson. And with the defense on the field more often, the offense will have less plays and less opportunities to do whats needed, nevermind build up stats.PS: Its the exact same staff as last year except subtract David Patten and add David Terrell(proven bust) and Tim Dwight who is only going to be a returner probably.</div> What does it matter? Last time I checked, Brady and the Pats have a FEW more rings than Chad and the Jets. [​IMG] That's the only stat that matters.
     
  9. ASUFan22

    ASUFan22 BBW Global Mod Team

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,673
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    It means they WERE a good TEAM. It doesen't mean Brady is the best QB in the league.
     
  10. SportsTicker

    SportsTicker News Feed

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    We never said Brady was the best QB in the NFL we said he will put up big numbers this year.
     
  11. manaleyo

    manaleyo BBW Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    pats chances of winning a superbowl this year are a little lower, cuz they kida had a rough offseason, im not sayin they have no change of winning though
     
  12. AdropOFvenom

    AdropOFvenom BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    11,586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PKS14 @ Aug 7 2005, 09:23 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Please don't say they will win the Superbowl, Venom will come in here and "try" and bash the Pats.</div> Its not a matter of bashing the Patriots, but you view them as an unstoppable force who will waltz to another superbowl. Im simply trying to make you realize that its simply not the case.
     
  13. SportsTicker

    SportsTicker News Feed

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    No I'm not saying that, I'm saying there offseason didn't hurt them that much and you disagree. I think they could win the superbowl but the same is told for 31 other teams.
     
  14. AdropOFvenom

    AdropOFvenom BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    11,586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (PKS14 @ Aug 8 2005, 12:24 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>No I'm not saying that, I'm saying there offseason didn't hurt them that much and you disagree. I think they could win the superbowl but the same is told for 31 other teams.</div> You kinda imply it. [​IMG] I view it as there is about 4 serious contenders in the AFC (Jets/Patriots/Colts/Steelers) and then about 6 pretenders (Chargers/Ravens/Jaguars/Bills/Chiefs/Broncos) and then a lot of pretenders.And I dont see Brady's numbers being about what they usually are 3500 yds, ect.
     
  15. SportsTicker

    SportsTicker News Feed

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,105
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Did you put the Jets first in contenders because you think they have the best shot?
     
  16. ASUFan22

    ASUFan22 BBW Global Mod Team

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,673
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I would put the Ravens as contenders and the Pats or Steelers as pretenders if there can be only 4 teams.
     
  17. rams28

    rams28 NFLC nflcentral.net Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ok as far as the superbowl is concerened, its gonna be tough. The teams in the NFL have changed a fair bit. BUT with the patriots i wouldn't be surprised if they do make it again. And yes some players have left in the off season but with the morale that the team has produced in the past 4 years, your gonna have new guys who are going to love playing for a team that walks away with wins. Now before anyone critices me, New Englan might not walk away with the wins they had last season but they will make it to the playoffs. Superbowl? I honestly don't know. But if they do make it to the big one again, and i'm not saying this coz i'm a St. Louis fan, but I hope its between these two because these are two teams with new potential and experienced players.
     
  18. AdropOFvenom

    AdropOFvenom BBW Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    11,586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ArizonaSportsFan22 @ Aug 8 2005, 05:05 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>I would put the Ravens as contenders and the Pats or Steelers as pretenders if there can be only 4 teams.</div> PKS, i put them in the order they came off the top of my head.AZSportsfan, I would, but to me the Ravens need to prove to me some things, they need to prove that Boller is good enough, they need to prove that Jamal Lewis can stay on the field, and they need to prove to me that they can hold up for a whole season without injuries/off field problems crippleing them.
     
  19. Chaintime

    Chaintime NFLC nflcentral.net Writing Team

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,118
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Oh okay didn't know that. Rams28, nice post and I agree with you.
     

Share This Page