Angry Oregon separatists are looking for a way to become part of Idaho

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
I think we should re-introduce the idea of territories. Let all the crazies have all the freedom and the guns they want and let us elect sane people at the federal level.
 
wizenheimer said:
wrong forum...should be in OT

and if those fucking idiots want to live in Idaho, there are U-Haul trucks everywhere
Click to expand...
They want to live in Idaho without moving.

Hey, I want to live in Canada without moving - I wonder if I can get to do that too!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
I say let them go, those regions of Oregon are net losses on the states tax revenues. Let them be Idaho's burden if they can talk Idaho into it.
 
donkiez said:
I say let them go, those regions of Oregon are net losses on the states tax revenues. Let them be Idaho's burden if they can talk Idaho into it.
Click to expand...

It would be funny if Oregon shrunk down to the size of Rhode Island.
 
meth and government subsidies. Pulling themselves up by their bootstraps, the way god intended.

barfo
 
If we allowed this, all rural areas would just become available to the highest bidder--whichever state was willing to give them the best anti-socialism handouts and subsidies.

It would be hell on the map-makers. No one ever considers the cartographers.
 
Minstrel said:
If we allowed this, all rural areas would just become available to the highest bidder--whichever state was willing to give them the best anti-socialism handouts and subsidies.

It would be hell on the map-makers. No one ever considers the cartographers.
Click to expand...

how about the trucking industry?

yeah im delivering in the same state today.
Yeah? Where at?
5 states over….
 
Minstrel said:
If we allowed this, all rural areas would just become available to the highest bidder--whichever state was willing to give them the best anti-socialism handouts and subsidies.

It would be hell on the map-makers. No one ever considers the cartographers.
Click to expand...

So like gerrymandering then?
 
Rastapopoulos said:
View attachment 41630

(i.e.: cooking meth)
Click to expand...

They should be careful for what they ask for.

The 5 (ish) counties that want to join Idaho? Their *total* population is bupkiss.

Malheur 30K people.

Sherman 1800

Grant 7300

Baker 17K

Lake 8K

That's about 65K people.

Throw in Harney (7300)

These guys are in for a shock when they wake up and realize that the tri county area (Mult, Clack and Washington) have 1.8 million people in it. That's 28X the population, and also means much more of the money for the state comes from us. So good luck with this.

Hell, Multnomah, Clackamas and Washington counties alone have more people in them than the ENTIRE state of Idaho.

Throw in Marion and Lane, and it's 2.6 million.

What exactly are they thinking they're gaining by doing this? They're just thinning the pot for Idaho, and making it better for the rest of the state of Oregon.
 
julius said:
They should be careful for what they ask for.

The 5 (ish) counties that want to join Idaho? Their *total* population is bupkiss.

Malheur 30K people.

Sherman 1800

Grant 7300

Baker 17K

Lake 8K

That's about 65K people.

Throw in Harney (7300)

These guys are in for a shock when they wake up and realize that the tri county area (Mult, Clack and Washington) have 1.8 million people in it. That's 28X the population, and also means much more of the money for the state comes from us. So good luck with this.
Click to expand...

All my all town conservatives friends think the electoral college should be adopted on a state level.
 
donkiez said:
All my all town conservatives friends think the electoral college should be adopted on a state level.
Click to expand...
Sure, one more nail in the coffin of one man one vote.
 
donkiez said:
All my all town conservatives friends think the electoral college should be adopted on a state level.
Click to expand...

That's arguably the dumbest thing ever uttered.

They realize it's population based, right? So it wouldn't be a 1 to 1 county vs county thing (since it's not for the states/general election). It'd still be weighted in the favor of the more populous counties.

I.e., no, malhuer county shouldn't have the same voting power as Clackamas.
 
julius said:
That's arguably the dumbest thing ever uttered.

They realize it's population based, right? So it wouldn't be a 1 to 1 county vs county thing (since it's not for the states/general election). It'd still be weighted in the favor of the more populous counties.

I.e., no, malhuer county shouldn't have the same voting power as Clackamas.
Click to expand...

It would still help the small counties relative to popular vote, if the number of electoral votes total was small. Because even a tiny county would always get at least 1 electoral vote.

barfo
 
julius said:
They should be careful for what they ask for.

The 5 (ish) counties that want to join Idaho? Their *total* population is bupkiss.

Malheur 30K people.

Sherman 1800

Grant 7300

Baker 17K

Lake 8K

That's about 65K people.

Throw in Harney (7300)

These guys are in for a shock when they wake up and realize that the tri county area (Mult, Clack and Washington) have 1.8 million people in it. That's 28X the population, and also means much more of the money for the state comes from us. So good luck with this.

Hell, Multnomah, Clackamas and Washington counties alone have more people in them than the ENTIRE state of Idaho.

Throw in Marion and Lane, and it's 2.6 million.

What exactly are they thinking they're gaining by doing this? They're just thinning the pot for Idaho, and making it better for the rest of the state of Oregon.
Click to expand...

I am going on record I am against this, tired of hearing about it. It is all over here in Central Oregon. But this is exactly why they are pushing this, no matter what Rural and Eastern Oregon does, they don't have as many people as the tri county area. The feeling is the state is managed for the mass populous and this side of the cascades has no say in how they are governed. They are never going to be happy unless a trump supporter gets in as governor of Oregon. They think since more land is over here they should have more vote, no matter that they are in the minority.
 
twobullz said:
I am going on record I am against this, tired of hearing about it. It is all over here in Central Oregon. But this is exactly why they are pushing this, no matter what Rural and Eastern Oregon does, they don't have as many people as the tri county area. The feeling is the state is managed for the mass populous and this side of the cascades has no say in how they are governed. They are never going to be happy unless a trump supporter gets in as governor of Oregon. They think since more land is over here they should have more vote, no matter that they are in the minority.
Click to expand...
Then they should pick up and move to Idaho. I wouldn't be so apprehensive about moving out there if it weren't for so many Trumpeting local yokals.

I get enough of that in Oregon City
 
Whats wrong with Merging Eastern Washington & Oregon with Idaho and Montana. Same demographics, trading routes & principle industries and ways of life. They would be about as big as Oregon then in population too.
State boundaries are so out dated and don't make a lot of since anymore.
 
Hoopguru said:
Whats wrong with Merging Eastern Washington & Oregon with Idaho and Montana. Same demographics, trading routes & principle industries and ways of life. They would be about as big as Oregon then in population too.
State boundaries are so out dated and don't make a lot of since anymore.
Click to expand...
So do away with Idaho and eastern washing and oregon and just make one big state? What benefit does that have to washington? Oregon? If people don't like they state they live in they are free to move, but a large majority of the people east of the cascades have ZERO interest in this.
 
Hoopguru said:
Whats wrong with Merging Eastern Washington & Oregon with Idaho and Montana. Same demographics, trading routes & principle industries and ways of life. They would be about as big as Oregon then in population too.
State boundaries are so out dated and don't make a lot of since anymore.
Click to expand...
Because I like having eastern Oregon be a part of the State. If they want to be in Idaho they should just move...
 
Last edited:
twobullz said:
So do away with Idaho and eastern washing and oregon and just make one big state? What benefit does that have to washington? Oregon? If people don't like they state they live in they are free to move, but a large majority of the people east of the cascades have ZERO interest in this.
Click to expand...
No, dont do away with Idaho just merge E.OR&WA/Idaho and Montana as one new State. Strength in numbers as well as same principle industries, trading routes, and ways of life are similar. They have more in common than with major west coast cites as Seattle, Tacoma, Portland, Eugene and population would be closer to same with all those smaller regions consolidated. Consolidation is the name of the game now days.
 
Phatguysrule said:
Because I like having eastern Oregon be a part of the State. If they want to be a in Idaho they should just move...
Click to expand...
Why not just give them more freedom from the metropolitan way and allow them to couple up with regions more like each other.
Western Oregon doesn't need the eastern regions to prosper.
 
Hoopguru said:
No, dont do away with Idaho just merge E.OR&WA/Idaho and Montana as one new State. Strength in numbers as well as same principle industries, trading routes, and ways of life are similar. They have more in common than with major west coast cites as Seattle, Tacoma, Portland, Eugene and population would be closer to same with all those smaller regions consolidated. Consolidation is the name of the game now days.
Click to expand...
So Boise should be part of Oregon and Eastern Oregon should be part of Montana. Consolidate all the Metro areas in the Country into one state and all rural into another and just have two states? Or just need to rearrange a lot of blue states to give more congressional districts to red states?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
Phatguysrule said:
Because I like having eastern Oregon be a part of the State. If they want to be a in Idaho they should just move...
Click to expand...
Why so? what is it you like about that area? Hundting/Fishing/Ranching/Farming/politics? or just the scenery?
Ive spent time in many Stats and Cities and I can tell you Spokane, Tri Cites, The Dalles, Pendleton, Baker, McCall, Boise/Pocatello, Missoula, Helena, Bozeman & Whitefish have a lot more in common with each other than Seattle, Bellevue, Tacoma, Olympia, Vancouver, Portland, Salem, & Eugene.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
OT Greater Idaho
2 3
Replies
83
Views
6K
Rastapopoulos
Rastapopoulos
Denny Crane
Idaho first to sign law aimed at health care plan
Replies
22
Views
1K
Denny Crane
Denny Crane
SlyPokerDog
OT Idaho mom, son charged over trip to Oregon with his teen girlfriend for abortion
Replies
4
Views
577
crandc
crandc
santeesioux
Marijuana is really cheap in Oregon
Replies
15
Views
2K
huevonkiller
huevonkiller
SlyPokerDog
Politics Trump officials met group pushing Alberta independence from Canada
Replies
0
Views
35
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top