OT "I'm Dealing With A Few Transgender Issues"

No, I provided the analysis that you left out. Again, you don't care to actually provide a real, thought-out idea. You want the people responding to you to figure out the problems with your idea and solve them, otherwise they're being unfair and "inferring."

Put some actual effort in. Then I won't snark.

 

WHICH IS??? About trans being the same? Ive addressed that tooo. If thats your rebuttal, its you not paying attention…

Why dont you just address it clearly so us stupid people can understand?? ??????

 

How hard is respectful conversation and communication for some people???

utterly bizarre…

 

You misunderstand me. I wasn't saying you missed something I said--I was saying you left the analysis out of your original post (the one I "snarked" about), and left it to me to provide it. Which is your pattern--you don't put the necessary analysis into your ideas, you expect people responding to do it for you and if they don't, you complain that they're not being fair.

 

i addressed the bold three times.

regarding numbers… yes tough luck.
You know what?

many schools don't have certain sports and activities due to lack of numbers.

Your snark is uncalled for and unproductive. And you have the gall to tell me to be better???

Just have a respectful conversation. Is that so fucking difficult?

 

^^^

 

It would make since for tran girl compete against men then trans guy compete against women.
It would be more fair imo.

the reason wrestlers and fighters have weight classes is for fairness.

 

again, bullshit. Weight classes in swimming would entail enough numbers for them.m to compete.
How is that not addressing your claim to my suggestion being so illogical it deserves your snark?? Your snark was moot with weight classes.

How pompous to dismiss my suggestion as ridiculous and throwing shit at wall that i should be better.


Besides throwing shit at walls and seeing what sticks has solves many a problem.


Just say yeah i didn't have to come off that way and could have asked how we would get around a lack of numbers to compete…

Its more respectable than to double down on arrogance…

 

And if being better means posting down to people.. im glad SlyPokerDog is such a loser idiot…

 

its like some of you don't really read the suggestions? Weight classes would not separate transgendered athletes from non.
It would be weight classes for all.
Regarding the one student not really being a problem. First, there is always a first. Until there are more.
And not being a problem now?

tell that to these people…

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/seco...teps-forward-describes-teammates-in-tears.amp

 

They would apply to all athletes. I don't think many people have an issue with a transgender on a team sport, as much as they do individual. Many individual sports have classes based on various factors like weight.

Or how about they continue to compete against the gender they would have prior to their change?

Forgive me for my atrocities as brainstorming ideas for discussion without thinking every detail out and dictating what should happen like some know it all.
I appreciate you asking questions and discussing ideas.
Its largely how most people learn.

 

Love ya, man.

 

brilliant! Do away with gender specific sports and go by weight only!

again. Nooo no one said that.

try again….

 

scroll up…

 

where in either of these posts do i insinuate removing the gender clause?