I'm curious, if it needs a prescription, if there will be doctors offering that the way some were when medical Marijuana was prominent
Remember, in Texas anyone who helps the woman is subject to $10,000 bounty, not just once but as many times as bounty hunters want. Including postal worker who delivers package.
The only moral abortion is my abortion was title of article detailing exactly that. They would go to great lengths to explain how they were different from "those sluts", even ask for separate waiting room so they wouldn't have to sit with the sluts getting abortions when they got an abortion. https://joycearthur.com/abortion/the-only-moral-abortion-is-my-abortion/
This is why I try to never address the human issue when debating "conservatives". They generally don't care about people they see as different from themselves. And they can draw that line wherever they see fit. I try to address the numbers and data. Problem is, somebody who can twist their perspective to believe a person deserves to suffer can twist their perspective to believe anything and disregard any data. The attack on logic and reason in this country has been so profoundly devastating...
Pretty big paintbrush there. I've shared in here before that I support organizations such as Mercy Multiplied. There are other alternatives to abortion....such as setting course to put the unborn child up for adoption. There are still plenty of couples out there that - for countless reasons - can't have biological children of their own. Adopting can be a wonderful option.
Case in point, and I'm not trying to be mean at all. All of that is great if you disregard the choices and feelings of the humans forced to go through hell to make any of that possible. Nobody is opposed to adoption or other alternatives to abortion. We are opposed to preventing women from choosing abortion if they determine that is the best course of action for themselves.
Yep. Pro Choice isn't pro abortion. It's that it should be an option if that's her/their choice....cause it's not mine to legislate/judge.
The alternative to abortion is giving birth. Something men love to dictate because they don't have to go through it. The same ones who consider putting a piece of cloth over their faces a monstrous violation of their freedom.
Don't be so sure of yourself. As mentioned in here many times before, I was part of the abortion process on three separate occasions and didn't "dictate" a thing otherwise.
You were prevented from dictating anything by law. Men voting for abortion restrictions are why the right for women to choose is being attacked.
What I was saying was that I didn't press any of the women to keep the child. That said, in each case, had they given birth, I was fully prepared to support the woman and child, whether in marriage, or otherwise.
So, you were cool with women carrying your potential children having abortions Yet, you come out against other women who practice their right to do the same.
Understood, and I would expect no less of a good man, such as yourself. But you have to also understand that what you are describing is anecdotal evidence. In other words, there are many women who are not as lucky as the women in your scenario. Society should be set up to protect the freedoms of the oppressed, such as women who currently live in Texas.
153 million orphans in the world and if someone causes unwanted pregnancies with several women leading to abortions yet claims they had no say in the matter did have a say before they ejaculated....but let's blame the women eh? I paid child support for 28 years....can't imagine doing that for 3 women and their children in my younger days....it's all I could handle to support one ex wife. Supporting 153 million orphans is something that's not being well funded as it is......if you're pro life....adopt orphans....don't bring more orphans to the poor house.
