If I am not mistaken, unless their is some sort of improvement done to the property, the taxes can only go up 3% per year no matter the increase in valuation.
This statement is Bull Shit because it denies majority rule. If you want your little bit of heaven to prevail, invite more people to live there and you'll have more weight at the polls. What do you think about the support that the urban areas provide for the rural areas? Are you willing to give that up?
...it's happening! >> https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/554332-oregon-counties-vote-to-secede-to-idaho
isn't that what idaho is doing? Inviting more like minded Oregonians to thier state? And arent those Oregonians actively looking to move? To say majority should always rule and if people dont like it they should find another slice of heaven is a tually the BS. ... im curious how that would go over with BLM? Minorities in general? Majority isn't always right and certainly doesn't always know whats best for everyone.
I'm sure I already said this in the thread, but good luck with some of those counties in Eastern Oregon. As much as they complain about how "blue" Portland/Willamette Valley, good luck with trying to find the $ to run all those empty ass counties.
Boise, Idaho, named most unaffordable city for homeowners in the U.S.. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/b...able-city-for-homeowners-in-the-us/vi-AASdloL
Modern America’s Most Successful Secessionist Movement (They're defining "most successful" by "number of counties that have passed nonbinding resolutions to approve such a move" which is...whatever. But the article is still pretty interesting.)
