Got to be kidding me... 6. Cincinnati (2-0; unranked): You can't help but respect what this team can do on both sides of the ball.7. N.Y. Giants (2-0; 11): It hasn't been pretty, but the Giants have two wins by convincing margins.8. Washington (2-0; unranked): Maybe Mark Brunell is the instant spark Joe Gibbs thought he would be.12. Dallas (1-1; 8): The Cowboys are still wondering how they blew that game to Washington. Jaguars are better than all of those teams. Just because they are 1-1, there only loss was to Indy IN Indy, and they held them to 10 points. The Jags could beat Washington, Dallas, New York, and Cincy any day of the week.
It's not about if they can beat a team... It's about how powerful they are so far.. as in winning by large margins, keeping the opposing team at a low score... being in the playoffs last year... etc.BTW: Steelers at NUMBA 1!!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ward86 @ Sep 20 2005, 08:35 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>BTW: Steelers at NUMBA 1!!</div> helll yeahhh AND ELEVATION, Redskins would kill the Jags.
Seriously, Brunell is looking great and his chemistry with Santana is perfect.And I would put Chiefs at 2, there just playing perfect, still a formidable offense and its time to take their defense seriously.Go skins and Vikings
His chemistry is perfect? He was god awful for 56 minutes of the game and only won because of a Cowboys collapse. The redskins even being listed there is only because they are '2-0' even though there are much better teams in the league.PS: Elevation, the Bengals would own the Jags, but the others I agree with you on.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ven0m @ Sep 23 2005, 04:51 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>His chemistry is perfect? He was god awful for 56 minutes of the game and only won because of a Cowboys collapse. The redskins even being listed there is only because they are '2-0' even though there are much better teams in the league.PS: Elevation, the Bengals would own the Jags, but the others I agree with you on.</div>Well Santana is showing potential to amass his last season stats, hes got 2 touchdowns in two games, last year he only had 5 touchdowns, and right now he's second in the league for recieving yards.You tell me if Moss is having a better year already with Brunell then Pennington...And did you see his performance agains Dallas, NFC Offensive POTW....and he has the highest average right now too
Yea Big Ben is looking suprisingly good in the passing game.And this is willie parker's breakthrough year, he will have a great season.
Had Dallas not blown that game against the skins, maybe they would be ranked higher, and the skins would be ranked lower.I still think Dallas is the better team. The mental aspect of their game last week is what killed them.
okokA win is a win, you can say whatever you want to excuse the fact that they lostyour giving reasons like "they lost cuz of the mental aspect of the game"you know what "killed them"?THE REDSKINS BABY
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (His Greatness @ Sep 23 2005, 01:44 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ven0m @ Sep 23 2005, 04:51 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'> His chemistry is perfect? He was god awful for 56 minutes of the game and only won because of a Cowboys collapse. The redskins even being listed there is only because they are '2-0' even though there are much better teams in the league.PS: Elevation, the Bengals would own the Jags, but the others I agree with you on.</div>Well Santana is showing potential to amass his last season stats, hes got 2 touchdowns in two games, last year he only had 5 touchdowns, and right now he's second in the league for recieving yards.You tell me if Moss is having a better year already with Brunell then Pennington...And did you see his performance agains Dallas, NFC Offensive POTW....and he has the highest average right now too </div> He had 0 TD's in his first 7.5 quarters as a Redskin... most of his stats are from those 2 plays at the end of the game. 109 yards and 2 TD's there, what did he do before that? He got 144 yards in 7.5 quarters. Not great...good...
