Re: Pats Win! 31-28 The Pats beat a depleted Falcons team today, as the falcons didnt have mike vick, but still, the pats went up by 15 and hang on to win with a last few seconds FG from the always clutch, Adam Vinatieri... I think the pats are back in business from getting crushed by the chargers last week.. what do u guys think?
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 Close game, but a win is a win. Brady had his best game of his life in my mind.. even though he threw a INT (which wasn't his fault). The Pats finally got the 2 tight ends into the action (Daniel Graham, Ben Watson). Also Bethel Johnson finally woke up and got a nice touchdown. Great game and hopefully this is going to continue in Denver and back home against the Colts.
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (HandZ19 @ Oct 9 2005, 02:47 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Close game, but a win is a win. Brady had his best game of his life in my mind.. even though he threw a INT (which wasn't his fault). The Pats finally got the 2 tight ends into the action (Daniel Graham, Ben Watson). Also Bethel Johnson finally woke up and got a nice touchdown. Great game and hopefully this is going to continue in Denver and back home against the Colts.</div> You posted the same exact thing in a different topic. The Falcons weren't depleted. They just had no Mike Vick. I thought Schaub picked up the load pretty well though. He had 3 TD and got all the receivers involved. If any team is depleted its the Patriots.
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>The Falcons weren't depleted. They just had no Mike Vick. I thought Schaub picked up the load pretty well though. He had 3 TD and got all the receivers involved. If any team is depleted its the Patriots.</div>ahh very true but still, a falcons team playing without mike vick is depleted in my book
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 'Pats are back in buisness' isnt going to happen at all if you mean another year of 14-2, 13-3 ish and a super bowl win. But they are a good team and will be in the playoffs.
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 It would have been different if they ha Vick, but a nice win by the Pats none the less.They will be in post season.
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SickVick7 @ Oct 10 2005, 07:43 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Vintage New England Patriot football.</div> haha what? If Vick suited up for this it would of been a totally different story, they were lucky to get by w/ the way Schwaub was playing
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 Yeah "if" "would have" "if only he had" <--- NONE of those happened so a win is a win in my book, Vick didnt play, thats fate for you right there.... Pats won, nicely done, good game by Schwaub though
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (WesTheBest217 @ Oct 10 2005, 08:10 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Yeah "if" "would have" "if only he had" <--- NONE of those happened so a win is a win in my book, Vick didnt play, thats fate for you right there.... Pats won, nicely done, good game by Schwaub though </div> that doesnt make it a vintage pats game like he said, you'd be able to consider it a classic game if Vick had played.
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 yeah, but i didnt say it was a vintage pats game! it was a vintage adam vinatieri finish though!
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 Of course it was a vintage Patriot game. Tom Brady coming down on the last drive to set up Vinateri for the FG. Happens a lot boys. Thats how they get it done.
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Chosen One @ Oct 11 2005, 07:45 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Adam comes throught again. He never lets his team down.A warrior.</div> Please don't call kickers warriors. The right word is that Vinateri is <u>clutch</u>. Very <u>clutch</u>.
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Chosen One @ Oct 11 2005, 07:45 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Adam comes throught again. He never lets his team down.A warrior.</div> His FG was a fricken Chip Shot. Any other kicker does it and its just their job, but when Vinatieri does it he is showing how clutch he is. Give me an F'n Break.
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 so much talk if Vick was there..first of all Schaub had a hell of a game..i doubt Vick would of done that good passing and if you say if they had michael vick..then i can say patriots didnt have...harrison..bruschi..seymour. injuries are part of a game..get used to it and no excuses like bellichick said
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 yeah for real, and if u wanna say "oh that kick was a chip shot" ok sure it was, but u know what? u cant tell me -10 degrees in the playoffs vs raiders 01' that that 40 yard kick in the blizzard was not clutch, u cant tell me all 3 kicks he made to win the 3 superbowls were not clutch, give ME a break..
Re: Pats Win! 31-28 <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (WesTheBest217 @ Oct 12 2005, 01:55 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>yeah for real, and if u wanna say "oh that kick was a chip shot" ok sure it was, but u know what? u cant tell me -10 degrees in the playoffs vs raiders 01' that that 40 yard kick in the blizzard was not clutch, u cant tell me all 3 kicks he made to win the 3 superbowls were not clutch, give ME a break..</div> Those kicks were clutch, but why is everybody jumping on Vinatieris nuts for making a 30 some yard kick in ideal kicking conditions.
